European Patent Office

T 0990/07 du 23.02.2010

Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
ECLI:EP:BA:2010:T099007.20100223
Date de la décision
23 février 2010
Numéro de l'affaire
T 0990/07
Requête en révision de
-
Numéro de la demande
04255379.2
Langue de la procédure
Anglais
Distribution
Distribuées aux présidents et aux membres des chambres de recours (B)
Téléchargement
Décision en anglais
Versions JO
Aucun lien JO trouvé
Autres décisions pour cet affaire
-
Résumés pour cette décision
-
Titre de la demande
Portable terminal apparatus
Nom du demandeur
FUJITSU LIMITED
Nom de l'opposant
-
Chambre
3.4.01
Sommaire

The purpose of the "examples" evoked in Rule 27(1)(e) EPC 1973 appears primarily to be to complete an otherwise incomplete teaching. As a consequence, the application cannot be refused under this provision if the description is considered to describe, despite the presence of erroneous drawings and the resulting lack of examples actually embodying the invention, "one way of carrying out the invention" (cf. point 3).

Mots-clés
Sufficiency of disclosure despite the absence of examples embodying the invention (yes)
Intermediate generalisation (allowable)
Clarity (yes)
Novelty -inventive step (yes)
Exergue
-

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside.

2. The case is remitted to the examining division with the order to grant a patent on the basis of the appellant's main request, i.e.:

- claims: 1-5 as approved by the appellant (cf. annex to the attendance note about a phone conversation held on 29 January 2010).

- description pages: 1-14 as approved by the appellant (cf. annex to the attendance note about a phone conversation held on 29 January 2010).

- drawing sheets 1/9 - 9/9 as originally filed.