T 1248/08 (Coating solution/SUMITOMO METAL MINING CO. LTD) du 16.02.2012
- Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
- ECLI:EP:BA:2012:T124808.20120216
- Date de la décision
- 16 février 2012
- Numéro de l'affaire
- T 1248/08
- Requête en révision de
- -
- Numéro de la demande
- 99309919.1
- Classe de la CIB
- C03C 17/00C03C 17/34
- Langue de la procédure
- Anglais
- Distribution
- Distribuées aux présidents des chambres de recours (C)
- Téléchargement
- Décision en anglais
- Versions JO
- Aucun lien JO trouvé
- Autres décisions pour cet affaire
- -
- Résumés pour cette décision
- -
- Titre de la demande
- Coating solution for forming a film for cutting off solar radiation and the film formed therefrom
- Nom du demandeur
- SUMITOMO METAL MINING COMPANY LIMITED
- Nom de l'opposant
- Akzo Nobel Coatings International N.V.
- Chambre
- 3.3.05
- Sommaire
- -
- Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
- European Patent Convention Art 111(1)European Patent Convention Art 112(1)(a)European Patent Convention Art 123(2)European Patent Convention Art 123(3)European Patent Convention Art 54European Patent Convention Art 87(1)European Patent Convention R 139
- Mots-clés
- Added subject-matter (main request, auxiliary requests 1 to 3) (yes) - illegible number in the application as originally filed - value not unambiguously derivable from graphical representation - a survey: not an acceptable evidence for supporting the most probable value - balance of probability: not an acceptable standard for determining the actual value - priority document cannot be used as a basis for corrections" "Referral to the EBA (no) - question already answered by the jurisprudence" "Disclaimer (auxiliary request 4): not allowable" "Added subject-matter (auxiliary request 5) (no) - range construction allowable - critical feature (weight ratio) not inextricably linked with further features - no inadmissible intermediate generalisation" "Extension of protection (auxiliary request 5) (no)" "Priority (validly claimed) - priority document was first application of the invention - earlier document D1 of same applicant not disclosing the same invention" "Novelty having regard to D1 (auxiliary request 5) (yes)" "Remittal for further prosecution
- Exergue
- -
ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. The decision under appeal is set aside.
2. The case is remitted to the department of first instance for further prosecution.