T 1142/12 du 08.04.2014
- Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
- ECLI:EP:BA:2014:T114212.20140408
- Date de la décision
- 8 avril 2014
- Numéro de l'affaire
- T 1142/12
- Requête en révision de
- -
- Numéro de la demande
- 05021885.8
- Classe de la CIB
- C08L 23/04
- Langue de la procédure
- Anglais
- Distribution
- Distribuées aux présidents et aux membres des chambres de recours (B)
- Téléchargement
- Décision en anglais
- Versions JO
- Aucun lien JO trouvé
- Autres décisions pour cet affaire
- -
- Résumés pour cette décision
- -
- Titre de la demande
- Polyethylene composition for injection moulding with improved stress crack/stiffness relation and impact resistance
- Nom du demandeur
- Borealis Technology Oy
- Nom de l'opposant
- -
- Chambre
- 3.3.03
- Sommaire
- -
- Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
- European Patent Convention Art 10European Patent Convention Art 10(1)European Patent Convention Art 10(2)European Patent Convention Art 10(2)(a)European Patent Convention Art 10(2)(b)European Patent Convention Art 112(1)(a)European Patent Convention Art 113(1)European Patent Convention Art 18(1)European Patent Convention Art 18(2)European Patent Convention Art 4European Patent Convention Art 6European Patent Convention Art 84European Patent Convention R 70aEuropean Patent Convention R 70bEuropean Patent Convention R 71European Patent Convention R 72
- Mots-clés
- Remittal with order to hold oral proceedings in Munich instead of The Hague - Board has no competence to take decision relating to the venues of oral proceedings Referral of question to the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (no, Board not competent)
Clarity of claims - (no)
Reimbursement of appeal fee - (no) - Exergue
- The question of the venue of oral proceedings is a matter of organisational nature which belongs to the management of the Office pursuant to Art.10 (2) EPC.
When not acceding to a request for holding oral proceedings in Munich instead of The Hague, the Examining Division does not take a decision but only expresses the way the EPO is managed.
Consequently, that issue is not subject to appeal, nor can the Board refer a question on the venue of oral proceedings to the Enlarged Board of Appeal. - Affaires citantes
- T 0831/17
Order
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. The appeal is dismissed.
2. The request for reimbursement of the appeal fee is refused.