European Patent Office

T 0970/17 du 14.10.2021

Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
ECLI:EP:BA:2021:T097017.20211014
Date de la décision
14 octobre 2021
Numéro de l'affaire
T 0970/17
Requête en révision de
-
Numéro de la demande
10183394.5
Langue de la procédure
Anglais
Distribution
Distribuées aux présidents des chambres de recours (C)
Téléchargement
Décision en anglais
Versions JO
Aucun lien JO trouvé
Autres décisions pour cet affaire
-
Résumés pour cette décision
-
Titre de la demande
Infusion apparatuses and related methods
Nom du demandeur
C.R. Bard, Inc.
Nom de l'opposant
Smiths Medical ASD, Inc.
Chambre
3.2.02
Sommaire
-
Mots-clés
Admissibility of appeal - (yes)
Admittance of claim requests - (yes / no)
Admittance of documents filed in appeal - (yes / no)
Amendments - extension beyond the content of the parent application as filed
Amendments - (no)
Amendments - extension beyond the content of the application as filed
Amendments - (no)
Amendments - extension of the scope of the patent ("aliud")
Amendments - (no)
Novelty - (yes, after amendment)
Inventive step - (yes)
Sufficiency of disclosure - (yes)
Late-filed objection - admitted
Late-filed objection - (no)
Referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (no)
Apportionment of costs - (no)
Exergue
Assessing compliance with Article 123(3) EPC does not include a test taking into account national infringement laws such as the rules on contributory infringement (point 6.2 of the Reasons).
Affaires citantes
T 0321/21

Order

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside.

2. The case is remitted to the opposition division with the order to maintain the patent as amended in the following version:

- claims 1-17 according to the third auxiliary request filed with the proprietor's statement of grounds of appeal

- description paragraphs [0001]-[0008] and [0010]-[0141] of the patent specification and paragraph [0009] as filed during the oral proceedings before the board on 14 October 2021

- Figures 1-59 of the patent specification

3. The opponent's request for referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal is refused.

4. The proprietor's request for apportionment of costs is refused.