European Patent Office

T 0600/18 (Storm Emma) du 04.02.2020

Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
ECLI:EP:BA:2020:T060018.20200204
Date de la décision
4 février 2020
Numéro de l'affaire
T 0600/18
Requête en révision de
-
Numéro de la demande
10765486.5
Classe de la CIB
B64C 13/46
Langue de la procédure
Anglais
Distribution
Non distribuées (D)
Téléchargement
Décision en anglais
Versions JO
Aucun lien JO trouvé
Autres décisions pour cet affaire
-
Résumés pour cette décision
-
Titre de la demande
TACTILE CUEING APPARATUS
Nom du demandeur
BAE Systems PLC
Nom de l'opposant
Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH
Chambre
3.2.01
Sommaire
-
Mots-clés
Re-establishment of rights (no)
Re-establishment of rights - no conclusive case presented in request
Re-establishment of rights - due care on the part of the professional representative (no)
Exergue
No conclusive case has been submitted with the request for re-establishment of rights that explains why an attempt was (erroneously) made to pay the appeal fee using a form that was no longer accepted at the EPO.
Article 122 EPC and the relevant case law does not excuse mistakes by the representative himself or herself that are caused by the ignorance of the latest provisions even if the representative does not normally perform the duty of paying fees himself or herself.
As he or she is the one that is expected to instruct and supervise his or her staff, he or she must always keep informed of the latest developments on how to handle the payment of fees.
As he or she is expected to remember what he or she has learned even in stressful situations it cannot be acknowledged that the mistake has happened despite all due care having been taken.
The situation (stress caused by an upcoming snow storm) cannot be equated with one where a patent attorney was incapable of taking sound decisions due to sudden serious illness or a sudden and unexpected bereavement.
Affaires citantes
J 0001/20

Order

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The request for re-establishment of rights is refused as inadmissible.

2. The appeal is deemed not to have been filed.

3. The appeal fee is to be reimbursed.