European Patent Office

T 0239/20 du 03.05.2022

Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
ECLI:EP:BA:2022:T023920.20220503
Date de la décision
3 mai 2022
Numéro de l'affaire
T 0239/20
Requête en révision de
-
Numéro de la demande
09169856.3
Classe de la CIB
B60N 2/28
Langue de la procédure
Anglais
Distribution
Non distribuées (D)
Téléchargement
Décision en anglais
Versions JO
Aucun lien JO trouvé
Autres décisions pour cet affaire
-
Résumés pour cette décision
-
Titre de la demande
Harness storage system for child car seats
Nom du demandeur
Wonderland Nurserygoods Company Limited
Nom de l'opposant
CYBEX GmbH
Intervener:
Columbus Trading-Partners GmbH & Co. KG
Chambre
3.2.01
Sommaire
-
Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
European Patent Convention Art 100(c)European Patent Convention Art 111(1)European Patent Convention Art 123(2)European Patent Convention Art 123(3)European Patent Convention Art 54(2)European Patent Convention Art 83European Patent Convention R 139European Patent Convention R 99(2)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 011Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 012(2)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 012(3)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 012(4)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 012(5)
Mots-clés
Correction of error - (yes)
Remittal - direct (no) ; Intervention
Remittal - special reasons for remittal (yes)
Grounds for opposition - subject-matter extends beyond content of earlier application (yes)
Amendment to case - auxiliary request 2
Amendment to case - amendment overcomes objection (no)
Amendments - auxiliary request 21
Amendments - extension beyond the content of the application as filed (no)
Amendments - extension of scope of protection (no)
Discretion not to admit submission - requirements of Art. 12(3) RPBA 2020 met (yes)
Sufficiency of disclosure - auxiliary request 21 (yes)
Novelty - public prior use availability to the public (yes)
Novelty - auxiliary request 21 (yes)
Exergue
-
Affaires citantes
T 0439/24

Order

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside.

2. The case is remitted to the Opposition Division for further prosecution.