T 0178/23 (Re-establishment of rights/Light-Med) du 11.10.2024
- Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
- ECLI:EP:BA:2024:T017823.20241011
- Date de la décision
- 11 octobre 2024
- Numéro de l'affaire
- T 0178/23
- Requête en révision de
- -
- Numéro de la demande
- 19768992.0
- Classe de la CIB
- H01L 25/065H01L 23/36H01L 21/48H01L 23/00H01L 23/373H01L 23/488
- Langue de la procédure
- Anglais
- Distribution
- Non distribuées (D)
- Téléchargement
- Décision en anglais
- Versions JO
- Aucun lien JO trouvé
- Autres décisions pour cet affaire
- -
- Résumés pour cette décision
- Résumé de Article 122 EPC
- Titre de la demande
- SILVER-INDIUM TRANSIENT LIQUID PHASE METHOD OF BONDING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND HEAT-SPREADING MOUNT AND SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE HAVING SILVER-INDIUM TRANSIENT LIQUID PHASE BONDING JOINT
- Nom du demandeur
- Light-Med (USA), Inc.
- Nom de l'opposant
- -
- Chambre
- 3.4.03
- Sommaire
- -
- Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
- European Patent Convention Art 108European Patent Convention Art 122(1)European Patent Convention Art 122(2)European Patent Convention R 136(1)European Patent Convention R 136(2)
- Mots-clés
- Re-establishment of rights - missed time limit for filing notice of appeal and for paying appeal fee
Re-establishment of rights - missed time limit for filing statement of grounds of appeal
Re-establishment of rights - one or two re-establishment fees due (left undecided)
Re-establishment of rights - request duly substantiated (no)
Re-establishment of rights - inability to observe a time limit (no)
Re-establishment of rights - request admissible (no)
Admissibility of appeal - appeal deemed not to have been filed - Exergue
- A party is not unable to observe a time limit vis- -vis the EPO within the meaning of Article 122(1) EPC if the obstacle relied on by the party does not relate to an error in the carrying out of the party's actual intention to meet a specific time limit, but only to a previous error as to motive in relation to the intention to use a legal remedy entailing a time limit (see section 5.3.5).
- Affaires citantes
- T 1874/23
Order
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. The request for re-establishment of rights is refused as inadmissible.
2. The appeal is deemed not to have been filed.