T 0830/91 (Late amendments) du 25.05.1993
- Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
- ECLI:EP:BA:1993:T083091.19930525
- Date de la décision
- 25 mai 1993
- Numéro de l'affaire
- T 0830/91
- Requête en révision de
- -
- Numéro de la demande
- 87116757.3
- Classe de la CIB
- A61K 47/00
- Langue de la procédure
- Anglais
- Distribution
- Publiées au Journal officiel de l'OEB (A)
- Téléchargement
- -
- Autres décisions pour cet affaire
- T 0830/91 Amendments/WHITBY 1994-09-15
- Résumés pour cette décision
- -
- Titre de la demande
- Penetration enhancers for transdermal delivery of systemic agents
- Nom du demandeur
- Whitby Research
- Nom de l'opposant
- -
- Chambre
- 3.3.02
- Sommaire
The following questions are referred to the Enlarged Board:
1. In the light of Article 113(2) EPC, is Rule 51(6) EPC to be interpreted such that an approval submitted under Rule 51(4) EPC becomes binding once a communication in accordance with Rule 51(6) EPC has been issued?
2. Is the European Patent Office obliged to consider reservations under Article 167(2) EPC as constituting requirements of the EPC which have to be met according to Article 96(2) EPC?
- Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
- European Patent Convention Art 112(1)(a) 1973European Patent Convention Art 113(2) 1973European Patent Convention Art 164(2) 1973European Patent Convention Art 167(2) 1973European Patent Convention Art 96(2) 1973European Patent Convention R 51 1973European Patent Convention R 86(3) 1973
- Mots-clés
- Admissibility of amendments after a Rule 51(6) communication
Reservations under Article 167(2) EPC
Referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal - Exergue
- -
- Affaires citées
- -
- Affaires citantes
- J 0030/95
ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that:
The following questions are referred to the Enlarged Board:
1. In the light of Article 113(2) EPC, is Rule 51(6) EPC to be interpreted such that an approval submitted under Rule 51(4) EPC becomes binding once a communication in accordance with Rule 51(6) EPC has been issued?
2. Is the European Patent Office obliged to consider reservations under Article 167(2) EPC as constituting requirements of the EPC which have to be met according to Article 96(2) EPC?