European Patent Office

T 0001/92 (Approval - Disapproval) du 27.04.1992

Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
ECLI:EP:BA:1992:T000192.19920427
Date de la décision
27 avril 1992
Numéro de l'affaire
T 0001/92
Requête en révision de
-
Numéro de la demande
85901706.3
Classe de la CIB
C12N 15/12
Langue de la procédure
Anglais
Distribution
Publiées au Journal officiel de l'OEB (A)
Téléchargement
Décision en anglais
Autres décisions pour cet affaire
-
Résumés pour cette décision
-
Titre de la demande
-
Nom du demandeur
Leland Stanford
Nom de l'opposant
-
Chambre
3.3.02
Sommaire

1. If, according to Rule 51(6) EPC it cannot be established beyond doubt at the end of the time limit under Rule 51(4) EPC, that the applicant approves the text in which the Examining Division intends to grant the European patent, the Examining Division cannot proceed to the grant of the patent and Rule 51(5) EPC applies. (cf. points 2 and 4.1 of the Reasons for the Decision).

2. The applicant is adversely affected in the sense of Article 107, first sentence, EPC if the patent is nevertheless granted (cf. point 1 of the Reasons for the Decision).

Mots-clés
Grant of European Patent - withdawal of approval of text of European patent
Admissibility of appeal (yes)
Appellant adversely affectd
Withdrawal of approval of text of European patent not taken into account
Suspensive effect of appeal
Cancellation of mention of grant of European patent
Substantial procedural violation (yes)
No opportunity to present comments
Reimbursement of appeal fee
Exergue
-
Affaires citées
-

ORDER

For these reasons, it is ordered that:

1. The decision of 19 August 1991 to grant European patent No. 0 174 366 is set aside.

2. A notice is to be published in the European Patent Bulletin, stating that the publication on 25 September 1991 of the mention of the grant of European patent No. 0 174 366 is to be disregarded and that the decision of 19 August 1991 to grant the same patent is without effect.

3. European patent application No. 85 901 706.3 is remitted to the Examining Division for further consideration.

4. The appeal fee is reimbursed.