T 1097/92 du 27.09.1993
- Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
- ECLI:EP:BA:1993:T109792.19930927
- Date de la décision
- 27 septembre 1993
- Numéro de l'affaire
- T 1097/92
- Requête en révision de
- -
- Numéro de la demande
- 87201440.2
- Classe de la CIB
- C08F 2/44
- Langue de la procédure
- Anglais
- Distribution
- Distribuées aux présidents et aux membres des chambres de recours (B)
- Téléchargement
- Décision en anglais
- Versions JO
- Aucun lien JO trouvé
- Autres décisions pour cet affaire
- -
- Résumés pour cette décision
- -
- Titre de la demande
- Process of (co)polymerization of alpha-olefins in the presence of stabilizers
- Nom du demandeur
- Enichem Synthesis S.p.A.
- Nom de l'opposant
- Interlocutory revision/ENICHEM
- Chambre
- 3.3.03
- Sommaire
- -
- Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
- European Patent Convention Art 109(1) 1973European Patent Convention Art 109(2) 1973
- Mots-clés
- Binding character of one-month term and prohibition of comment by Art. 109(2), but not of exclusion of telephone contact with applicant stipulated by Guidelines
Interlocutory revision - remittal to the Board of Appeal
Interlocutory revision - circumstances giving rise to
Amendments - agreed by the Boards of Appeal
Decision re appeal - remittal (yes) - Exergue
- The one-month term stipulated by Article 109(2) has to be strictly adhered to. In certain situations, a telephone contact with the Appellant during the term available for any interlocutory revision may be appropriate and indeed helpful. If such a telephone contact is held, however it should not be recorded in writing in such a way as to constitute a comment on the merits of the appeal.
- Affaires citées
- T 0139/87
- Affaires citantes
- -
ORDER
For these reasons, it is decided that:
1. The decision under appeal is set aside.
2. The case is remitted to the Examining Division for further prosecution on the basis of the sets of claims submitted on 10 August 1993.