T 0227/95 (Air conditioner/NIPPONDENSO) du 11.04.1996
- Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
- ECLI:EP:BA:1996:T022795.19960411
- Date de la décision
- 11 avril 1996
- Numéro de l'affaire
- T 0227/95
- Requête en révision de
- -
- Numéro de la demande
- 85307532.3
- Classe de la CIB
- B60H 1/00
- Langue de la procédure
- Anglais
- Distribution
- Distribuées aux présidents et aux membres des chambres de recours (B)
- Téléchargement
- Décision en anglais
- Versions JO
- Aucun lien JO trouvé
- Autres décisions pour cet affaire
- -
- Résumés pour cette décision
- -
- Titre de la demande
- Air conditioner for automobiles
- Nom du demandeur
- NIPPONDENSO CO., LTD.
- Nom de l'opposant
- Robert Bosch GmbH
Rodacher Autoklima GmbH
Behr GmbH & Co. - Chambre
- 3.5.01
- Sommaire
- -
- Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
- European Patent Convention Art 107 1973European Patent Convention Art 111(1) 1973European Patent Convention Art 113(1) 1973European Patent Convention R 58(4) 1973European Patent Convention R 67 1973European Patent Convention R 68(2) 1973
- Mots-clés
- The order of the Board's decision not carried out by the Opposition Division - procedural violation
Remittal of the case and reimbursement of the fee - Exergue
- I. An opponent who did not appeal the first decision by the Opposition Division to reject the oppositions may still be considered adversely affected in accordance with Article 107 EPC by a second decision of that division (after remittal) maintaining the patent in amended form. Such an opponent is entitled to appeal said second decision, if he originally had requested the revocation of the patent in its entirety.
II. For a decision to be properly reasoned as required under Rule 68(2) EPC, the reasons must clarify the standpoints of the body responsible for the decision and be adequately connected to the resulting order. Where a remittal has taken place with the order to prosecute the case further, it is incumbent upon the first instance to examine all the patentability issues arising from this order, and give adequate reasons on each such issue. - Affaires citantes
- T 0911/98
ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. The decision under appeal is set aside.
2. The case is remitted to the department of the first instance for further prosecution, taking point 5.2 of T 0527/92 into consideration.
3. The reimbursement of the appeal fee is ordered.