T 0048/00 (Substantial procedural violation/CERESTAR) vom 12.06.2002
- Europäischer Rechtsprechungsidentifikator
- ECLI:EP:BA:2002:T004800.20020612
- Datum der Entscheidung
- 12. Juni 2002
- Aktenzeichen
- T 0048/00
- Antrag auf Überprüfung von
- -
- Anmeldenummer
- 91310627.4
- IPC-Klasse
- A23G 1/00
- Verfahrenssprache
- Englisch
- Verteilung
- An die Kammervorsitzenden und -mitglieder verteilt (B)
- Download
- Entscheidung auf Englisch
- Amtsblattfassungen
- Keine AB-Links gefunden
- Weitere Entscheidungen für diese Akte
- -
- Zusammenfassungen für diese Entscheidung
- -
- Bezeichnung der Anmeldung
- Process for the production of chocolate
- Name des Antragstellers
- CERESTAR HOLDING BV
- Name des Einsprechenden
- ROQUETTE FRERES, S.A.
- Kammer
- 3.3.02
- Leitsatz
- -
- Relevante Rechtsnormen
- European Patent Convention Art 102(1) 1973European Patent Convention Art 104(1) 1973European Patent Convention Art 113(1) 1973European Patent Convention Art 116(1) 1973European Patent Convention R 51(4) 1973European Patent Convention R 67 1973European Patent Convention R 68(2) 1973European Patent Convention R 71a 1973Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 10
- Schlagwörter
- Substantial procedural violation - yes - inadmissibility of late filed request in oral proceedings at the opposition stage immediately followed by revocation of the patent - unsatisfactory wording before final decision - meaning of
of main request
Remittal to first instance - (yes)
Reimbursement of appeal fee - (no) - not equitable in the circumstances of the case
Apportionment of costs - more appropriate for decision in resumed first instance proceedings - Orientierungssatz
- -
ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. The decision under appeal is set aside.
2. The case is remitted to the first instance for further prosecution.
3. The request for reimbursement of the appeal fee is refused.
4. The request for apportionment of costs is refused.