T 0681/01 vom 28.11.2006
- Europäischer Rechtsprechungsidentifikator
- ECLI:EP:BA:2006:T068101.20061128
- Datum der Entscheidung
- 28. November 2006
- Aktenzeichen
- T 0681/01
- Antrag auf Überprüfung von
- -
- Anmeldenummer
- 97307021.2
- IPC-Klasse
- D06P 1/44
- Verfahrenssprache
- Englisch
- Verteilung
- An die Kammervorsitzenden verteilt (C)
- Download
- Entscheidung auf Englisch
- Amtsblattfassungen
- Keine AB-Links gefunden
- Weitere Entscheidungen für diese Akte
- -
- Zusammenfassungen für diese Entscheidung
- -
- Bezeichnung der Anmeldung
- A treated fabric, a method of treatment and a window covering product comprising such material
- Name des Antragstellers
- HUNTER DOUGLAS INDUSTRIES B.V.
- Name des Einsprechenden
- 01: Junkers + Müllers GmbH
02: LOUVER-LITE Ltd - Kammer
- 3.3.07
- Leitsatz
(1) Article 69 EPC and the protocol thereto cannot be relied on to read into the claim an implicit restrictive feature not suggested by the explicit wording of the claim (see point 2.1.1)
(2) There must be something in the circumstances that suggests that a confidential relation existed before a delivery which appears to be the result of an ordinary commercial transaction can be disregarded as not making the delivered goods available to a member of the public.
- Relevante Rechtsnormen
- European Patent Convention Art 111 1973European Patent Convention Art 123 1973European Patent Convention Art 54 1973European Patent Convention Art 69 1973European Patent Convention Art 83 1973European Patent Convention Art 84 1973European Patent Convention R 57a 1973
- Schlagwörter
- Claim construction - reliance on Article 69 EPC to restrict claim (no)
Prior use - confidentiality (no)
Novelty - Main request, first auxiliary request (no)
Amendment allowable (Article 123(2)EPC) - second auxiliary request (no)
Novelty third auxiliary request over particular prior use (yes)
Remittal (yes) - Orientierungssatz
- -
ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. The decision under appeal is set aside.
2. The case is remitted to the first instance for further prosecution on the basis of the seven claims filed as Third Auxiliary Request at the oral proceedings on 28 November 2006.