European Patent Office

T 0990/07 vom 23.02.2010

Europäischer Rechtsprechungsidentifikator
ECLI:EP:BA:2010:T099007.20100223
Datum der Entscheidung
23. Februar 2010
Aktenzeichen
T 0990/07
Antrag auf Überprüfung von
-
Anmeldenummer
04255379.2
Verfahrenssprache
Englisch
Verteilung
An die Kammervorsitzenden und -mitglieder verteilt (B)
Amtsblattfassungen
Keine AB-Links gefunden
Weitere Entscheidungen für diese Akte
-
Zusammenfassungen für diese Entscheidung
-
Bezeichnung der Anmeldung
Portable terminal apparatus
Name des Antragstellers
FUJITSU LIMITED
Name des Einsprechenden
-
Kammer
3.4.01
Leitsatz

The purpose of the "examples" evoked in Rule 27(1)(e) EPC 1973 appears primarily to be to complete an otherwise incomplete teaching. As a consequence, the application cannot be refused under this provision if the description is considered to describe, despite the presence of erroneous drawings and the resulting lack of examples actually embodying the invention, "one way of carrying out the invention" (cf. point 3).

Schlagwörter
Sufficiency of disclosure despite the absence of examples embodying the invention (yes)
Intermediate generalisation (allowable)
Clarity (yes)
Novelty -inventive step (yes)
Orientierungssatz
-

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside.

2. The case is remitted to the examining division with the order to grant a patent on the basis of the appellant's main request, i.e.:

- claims: 1-5 as approved by the appellant (cf. annex to the attendance note about a phone conversation held on 29 January 2010).

- description pages: 1-14 as approved by the appellant (cf. annex to the attendance note about a phone conversation held on 29 January 2010).

- drawing sheets 1/9 - 9/9 as originally filed.