T 1248/08 (Coating solution/SUMITOMO METAL MINING CO. LTD) vom 16.02.2012
- Europäischer Rechtsprechungsidentifikator
- ECLI:EP:BA:2012:T124808.20120216
- Datum der Entscheidung
- 16. Februar 2012
- Aktenzeichen
- T 1248/08
- Antrag auf Überprüfung von
- -
- Anmeldenummer
- 99309919.1
- IPC-Klasse
- C03C 17/00C03C 17/34
- Verfahrenssprache
- Englisch
- Verteilung
- An die Kammervorsitzenden verteilt (C)
- Download
- Entscheidung auf Englisch
- Amtsblattfassungen
- Keine AB-Links gefunden
- Weitere Entscheidungen für diese Akte
- -
- Zusammenfassungen für diese Entscheidung
- -
- Bezeichnung der Anmeldung
- Coating solution for forming a film for cutting off solar radiation and the film formed therefrom
- Name des Antragstellers
- SUMITOMO METAL MINING COMPANY LIMITED
- Name des Einsprechenden
- Akzo Nobel Coatings International N.V.
- Kammer
- 3.3.05
- Leitsatz
- -
- Relevante Rechtsnormen
- European Patent Convention Art 111(1)European Patent Convention Art 112(1)(a)European Patent Convention Art 123(2)European Patent Convention Art 123(3)European Patent Convention Art 54European Patent Convention Art 87(1)European Patent Convention R 139
- Schlagwörter
- Added subject-matter (main request, auxiliary requests 1 to 3) (yes) - illegible number in the application as originally filed - value not unambiguously derivable from graphical representation - a survey: not an acceptable evidence for supporting the most probable value - balance of probability: not an acceptable standard for determining the actual value - priority document cannot be used as a basis for corrections" "Referral to the EBA (no) - question already answered by the jurisprudence" "Disclaimer (auxiliary request 4): not allowable" "Added subject-matter (auxiliary request 5) (no) - range construction allowable - critical feature (weight ratio) not inextricably linked with further features - no inadmissible intermediate generalisation" "Extension of protection (auxiliary request 5) (no)" "Priority (validly claimed) - priority document was first application of the invention - earlier document D1 of same applicant not disclosing the same invention" "Novelty having regard to D1 (auxiliary request 5) (yes)" "Remittal for further prosecution
- Orientierungssatz
- -
ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. The decision under appeal is set aside.
2. The case is remitted to the department of first instance for further prosecution.