T 1100/10 (Detergent Bacillus lentus subtilisin protease egg stains/BASF) vom 18.03.2014

Europäischer Rechtsprechungsidentifikator: ECLI:EP:BA:2014:T110010.20140318
Datum der Entscheidung: 18. März 2014
Aktenzeichen: T 1100/10
Antrag auf Überprüfung von: -
Anmeldenummer: 95912559.2
IPC-Klasse: C12N 9/56 C12N 9/54 C11D 3/386 C12N 15/57 C12N 9/52
Verfahrenssprache: Englisch
Verteilung: An die Kammervorsitzenden und -mitglieder verteilt (B)
Download: Entscheidung auf Englisch
Amtsblattfassungen: Keine AB-Links gefunden
Weitere Entscheidungen für diese Akte: -
Zusammenfassungen für diese Entscheidung: -
Bezeichnung der Anmeldung: IMPROVED ENZYMES AND DETERGENTS CONTAINING THEM
Name des Antragstellers: BASF SE
Name des Einsprechenden: Novozymes A/S
Danisco US Inc.
Kammer: 3.3.08
Leitsatz: -
Relevante Rechtsnormen: European Patent Convention Art 112(1)(a)European Patent Convention Art 113 European Patent Convention Art 114(2)European Patent Convention Art 15 European Patent Convention Art 23(4)European Patent Convention Art 35(1)European Patent Convention Art 54 European Patent Convention Art 56 European Patent Convention Art 83 European Patent Convention Art 84 European Patent Convention R 116(1)European Patent Convention R 12(1)European Patent Convention R 12(3)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 12(4)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13(1)
Schlagwörter: Admissibility of the Main Request and of Auxiliary Requests 1 and 2 (no); Admissibility of Auxiliary Request 3 (yes);
Referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal (no);
Auxiliary Request 3 - requirements of the EPC (yes);
Orientierungssatz: Although the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal (RPBA) are drafted and adopted by the Presidium, it is the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation which decides to approve the RPBA. Only thereby the RPBA enter into force to be applied by the Boards of Appeal (cf. points (9) to (14) of the Reasons for the Decision).
Zitierte Akten: G 0002/10 T 0118/89 T 0214/05 T 1213/05 T 0349/09
Zitierende Akten: T 1776/18

Order

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside.

2. The case is remitted to the department of first instance with the order to maintain the patent in amended form on the basis of Auxiliary Request 3 filed on 18 March 2014 during the oral proceedings and a description to be adapted thereto.