T 2147/16 vom 07.09.2021
- Europäischer Rechtsprechungsidentifikator
- ECLI:EP:BA:2021:T214716.20210907
- Datum der Entscheidung
- 7. September 2021
- Aktenzeichen
- T 2147/16
- Antrag auf Überprüfung von
- -
- Anmeldenummer
- 13194781.4
- IPC-Klasse
- G06Q 10/10H04L 12/58
- Verfahrenssprache
- Englisch
- Verteilung
- Nicht verteilt (D)
- Download
- Entscheidung auf Englisch
- Amtsblattfassungen
- Keine AB-Links gefunden
- Weitere Entscheidungen für diese Akte
- -
- Zusammenfassungen für diese Entscheidung
- -
- Bezeichnung der Anmeldung
- System and method for detecting spam using clustering and rating of e-mails
- Name des Antragstellers
- Kaspersky Lab, ZAO
- Name des Einsprechenden
- -
- Kammer
- 3.4.03
- Leitsatz
- -
- Relevante Rechtsnormen
- Decision of national courts cited: German Federal Patent Court (Bundespatentgericht) 20 W (pat) 13/09European Patent Convention Art 56
- Schlagwörter
- Inventive step - (no)
Inventive step - effect not made credible within the whole scope of claim
Inventive step - improvement not credible
Inventive step - obvious combination of known features
Inventive step - mixture of technical and non-technical features
Inventive step - problem and solution approach
Inventive step - obvious solution - Orientierungssatz
- The mere assumption that an algorithm is optimised for the computer hardware and may have a technical contribution is not sufficient. The implementation of an algorithm in a method for filtering spam messages must have a proved further technical effect or specific technical considerations; such further technical effect must be specifically and sufficiently documented in the disclosure of the invention and be reflected in the claim wording; the algorithm must serve a technical purpose.
Order
For these reasons it is decided that:
The appeal is dismissed.