European Patent Office

T 0154/04 (Estimating sales activity / DUNS LICENSING ASSOCIATES) vom 15.11.2006

Europäischer Rechtsprechungsidentifikator
ECLI:EP:BA:2006:T015404.20061115
Datum der Entscheidung
15. November 2006
Aktenzeichen
T 0154/04
Antrag auf Überprüfung von
-
Anmeldenummer
94912949.8
IPC-Klasse
G06F 15/21
Verfahrenssprache
Englisch
Verteilung
Im Amtsblatt des EPA veröffentlicht (A)
Amtsblattfassungen
Weitere Entscheidungen für diese Akte
-
Zusammenfassungen für diese Entscheidung
-
Bezeichnung der Anmeldung
Method of estimating product distribution
Name des Antragstellers
DUNS LICENSING ASSOCIATES, L.P.
Name des Einsprechenden
-
Kammer
3.5.01
Leitsatz

I. Methods of business research are excluded "as such" from patentability under Article 52(2)(c) and (3) EPC.

II. Gathering and evaluating data as part of a business research method do not convey technical character to the business research method if such steps do not contribute to the technical solution of a technical problem.

Relevante Rechtsnormen
European Patent Convention Art 112(1)(a) 1973European Patent Convention Art 112(1)(b) 1973European Patent Convention Art 123(2) 1973European Patent Convention Art 52(1)European Patent Convention Art 52(1) 1973European Patent Convention Art 52(2) 1973European Patent Convention Art 52(3) 1973European Patent Convention Art 54 1973European Patent Convention Art 56 1973Judgement of the England and Wales Court of Appeal in re Aerotel Ltd v Telco Holdings Ltd (and others) and Macrossan´s Patent Application [2006] EWCA Civ 1371Judgement of the England and Wales Court of Appeal in re Genentech Inc.'s Patent [1989] R.P.C. 147Judgement of the German Federal Court of Justice X ZB 20/03 - elektronischer Zahlungsverkehr of 24 May 2004Judgement of the England and Wales Court of Appeal in re Aerotel Ltd v Telco Holdings Ltd (and others) and Macrossan´s Patent Application [2006] EWCA Civ 1371Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 15Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 16Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969) Art 31
Schlagwörter
Requirement of invention - method, main request (no)
Requirement of invention - method, auxiliary request 1 (yes)
Inventive step - system, main and auxiliary requests 1 to 3 (no)
Amendments - claim 1, auxiliary requests 4 and 5 (inadmissible)
Remittal for further prosecution (refused)
Referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal (refused)
Orientierungssatz
-

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

The appeal is dismissed.