T 0255/22 vom 10.05.2023
- Europäischer Rechtsprechungsidentifikator
- ECLI:EP:BA:2023:T025522.20230510
- Datum der Entscheidung
- 10. Mai 2023
- Aktenzeichen
- T 0255/22
- Antrag auf Überprüfung von
- -
- Anmeldenummer
- 11718513.2
- Verfahrenssprache
- Englisch
- Verteilung
- An die Kammervorsitzenden verteilt (C)
- Download
- Entscheidung auf Englisch
- Amtsblattfassungen
- Keine AB-Links gefunden
- Weitere Entscheidungen für diese Akte
- -
- Zusammenfassungen für diese Entscheidung
- Zusammenfassung von EPC2000 R 140
- Bezeichnung der Anmeldung
- STAIR TREAD ELEMENT, STAIR RENOVATION ORNAMENT, KIT AND METHOD
- Name des Antragstellers
- SIP B.V.
- Name des Einsprechenden
- Van Eyck Shutters B.V.
- Kammer
- 3.2.03
- Leitsatz
- -
- Relevante Rechtsnormen
- European Patent Convention Art 106European Patent Convention Art 107European Patent Convention Art 111(1)European Patent Convention Art 112a(1)European Patent Convention R 103(1)(a)European Patent Convention R 111(2)European Patent Convention R 124(1)European Patent Convention R 124(3)European Patent Convention R 139European Patent Convention R 140Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 012(1)(a)
- Schlagwörter
- Admissibility of appeal - left open
Correction of error in decisions
Correction of error - alleged errors concern reasons given by department of first instance in written decisions
Correction of minutes of department of first instance
Reimbursement of appeal fee - (no) - Orientierungssatz
- No competence for the Board to correct or amend under Rule 140 EPC the reasons given by a first-instance department in the written decision, or to order such a correction or amendment (see point 2.2.1).
No competence for the Board to confirm that an "obvious mistake" within the meaning of Rule 140 EPC was made in the reasons given by a first-instance department in the written decision (see point 2.3).
No competence for the Board to correct or amend the content of the minutes of oral proceedings before a first-instance department, or to order such a correction or amendment (see point 3.3).
Order
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. The appeal is dismissed.
2. The request for reimbursement of the appeal fee is refused.