European Patent Office

T 0327/92 (Oriented film laminates of polyamides and ethylene vinyl alcohol) vom 22.04.1997

Europäischer Rechtsprechungsidentifikator
ECLI:EP:BA:1997:T032792.19970422
Datum der Entscheidung
22. April 1997
Aktenzeichen
T 0327/92
Antrag auf Überprüfung von
-
Anmeldenummer
84106652.5
IPC-Klasse
B32B 27/08
Verfahrenssprache
Englisch
Verteilung
An die Kammervorsitzenden und -mitglieder verteilt (B)
Amtsblattfassungen
Keine AB-Links gefunden
Weitere Entscheidungen für diese Akte
-
Zusammenfassungen für diese Entscheidung
-
Bezeichnung der Anmeldung
Oriented film laminates of polyamides and ethylene vinyl alcohol
Name des Antragstellers
ALLIEDSIGNAL INC.
Name des Einsprechenden
Wolff Walsrode AG
Kammer
3.3.04
Leitsatz
-
Schlagwörter
Jurisdiction of Board of Appeal to consider opposition grounds on appeal where patent revoked by first instance
Novelty - main request (no) - auxiliary request (yes)
Inventive step auxiliary request (yes)
Substantial procedural violation (no)
Refund of appeal fee (no)
Orientierungssatz
Where a patent has been revoked by the Opposition Division, then on appeal the Board of Appeal is entitled to consider all material in the opposition on all grounds originally alleged, even where the opponent no longer opposes the grant of a patent and the conclusion of the Board on a particular ground differs from that of Opposition Division (Reasons section 1).
An intermediate product which exists only for some sixty seconds before being further processed, can destroy novelty of a claim where the intermediate product meets all the technical characteristics required by the claim (Reasons section 2.2).
Reliance by the Opposition Division at oral proceedings on a document originally cited in the opposition against a dependent claim only, as closest prior art against an amended main claim, does not amount to a substantial procedural violation where patentee had the opportunity at oral proceedings to comment (Reasons section 5).

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside.

2. The case is referred back to the first instance with the order to maintain the patent on the basis of the first auxiliary request filed on 5 November 1996 with the amendment to claim 4 received on 26 November 1996, and a description to be adapted.

3. The request for reimbursement of the appeal fee is refused.