European Patent Office

T 0292/85 (Polypeptide expression) of 27.01.1988

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:1988:T029285.19880127
Date of decision
27 January 1988
Case number
T 0292/85
Petition for review of
-
Application number
78300596.0
IPC class
C12K 1/02
Language of proceedings
English
Distribution
Published in the EPO's Official Journal (A)
Other decisions for this case
-
Abstracts for this decision
-
Application title
-
Applicant name
Genentech
Opponent name
-
Board
3.3.02
Headnote

1. An invention (here: biological) is sufficiently disclosed if at least one way is clearly indicated enabling the person skilled in the art to carry out the invention. Then the non-availability of some particular variants or unsuitability of some unspecified variants of a functionally defined component feature of the invention is immaterial to sufficiency as long as there are suitable variants known to the skilled person through the disclosure or common general knowledge which provide the same effect for the invention. The disclosure need not include specific instructions as to how all possible component variants within the functional definition should be obtained (cf. point 3.1.5 of the Reasons).

2. Generally applicable biological processes are not insufficiently described for the sole reason that some starting materials or genetic precursors therefor, e.g. a particular DNA or plasmid, are not readily available to obtain each and every variant of the expected result of the invention (here: product) provided the process as such is reproducible (cf. point 3.3.3 of the Reasons).

3. The non-obviousness of the plasmids also imparts an inventive step to the other claimed subject-matters relating to their preparation and to their use for making polypeptides and immunogenic substances.

Keywords
Sufficiency of disclosure
Functional terms in claims
Provision of all embodiments
Inclusion of future inventions
Non-availability or unsuitability of some components
Non-availability of starting materials for general processes
Inventive step
Closest art pointing away from invention
Trial doomed to failure
Common general knowledge
Publications qualifying in early history of a particular art
Non-obviousness of plasmids
Other claimed subject-matter involving plasmids
Catchword
-
Cited cases
-

ORDER

For these reasons, it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside.

2. The patent is granted on the basis of description and the Claims 1 to 16, as submitted during the oral proceedings with the drawings as originally filed.