European Patent Office

T 0711/99 (Transfer of opposition/L'OREAL) of 21.10.2003

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2003:T071199.20031021
Date of decision
21 October 2003
Case number
T 0711/99
Petition for review of
-
Application number
94402525.3
IPC class
A61K 7/13
Language of proceedings
French
Distribution
Published in the EPO's Official Journal (A)
Other decisions for this case
-
Abstracts for this decision
-
Application title
Composition de teinture d'oxydation des fibres kératiniques comprenant un dérivé de paraphénylènediamine et un dérivé de métaphénylènediamine, et procédé de teinture utilisant une telle composition
Applicant name
L'OREAL
Opponent name
Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Wella AG Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
Board
3.3.07
Headnote

I. The opponent does not have the right to dispose freely of his status as a party, following the general principle of law whereby legal actions are not transferable by way of singular succession - whether for a consideration or not - but only by way of universal succession (point 2.1.5(b)). Once he has filed an opposition and met the requirements for an admissible opposition, he is an opponent and remains so until the end of the proceedings or of his involvement in them.

II. Opponent status may be transferred to a singular successor when a commercial department is sold, but this is an exception to the general principle in law whereby an opposition is not freely disposable.

III. This exception should be a narrowly interpretated (point 2.1.5(c)) and precludes an opponent parent company from being recognised, in the event of the sale of a subsidiary that has always been entitled itself to file oppositions, as having the right to transfer its opponent status, by analogy with an opponent who sells a commercial department that is an inseparable part of the opposition but is not itself entitled to file oppositions (point 2.1.5(f)). The notion of legitimate interest in the proceedings, which is irrelevant for the admissibility of an opposition at the time of its filing, likewise has no bearing on the opponent's status at any subsequent stage (point 2.1.5(d)).

Keywords
Transfer of opposition (no)
Amendments - admissible (yes)
Novelty vis-à-vis documents referred to in notice of opposition (yes)
New evidence: public prior use - late (yes) - relevant (no); new document - late (yes) - relevant (yes)
Remittal (yes)
Catchword
-

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside.

2. The transfer of the opposition is refused.

3. The case is remitted to the department of first instance for further prosecution.