T 0298/97 (Detergent compositions/UNILEVER) of 28.05.2001
- European Case Law Identifier
- ECLI:EP:BA:2001:T029897.20010528
- Date of decision
- 28 May 2001
- Case number
- T 0298/97
- Petition for review of
- -
- Application number
- 89304210.1
- IPC class
- C11D 11/00
- Language of proceedings
- English
- Distribution
- Published in the EPO's Official Journal (A)
- Download
- Decision in English
- Other decisions for this case
- -
- Abstracts for this decision
- -
- Application title
- Detergent compositions and process for preparing them
- Applicant name
- UNILEVER PLC
- Opponent name
- NV PROCTER & GAMBLE EUROPEAN TECHNICAL CENTER
- Board
- 3.3.06
- Headnote
1. If the Notice of Appeal is filed by an adversely affected party but the Grounds of Appeal are filed by a (natural or legal) person who, although having economic connections with that adversely affected party, is not itself that party, the appeal cannot be held admissible. (See reasons, points 3.2 and 3.3)
2. No provision having been made in the Implementing Regulations pursuant to Article 133(3) EPC, last sentence, the EPC does not currently allow the representation of one legal person by the employee of another economically related legal person. (See reasons, point 4)
3. Save in the limited situation of a transfer of the right to oppose a European patent (or to appeal or continue an opposition appeal) together with the related business assets of the opponent's business, a commercial interest in revocation of such patent is not a requirement for being an opponent. Nor is possession of such a commercial interest sufficient to allow a successor in business to take over and conduct opposition or opposition appeal proceedings in the absence of evidence of a transfer of the right to do so together with the related business assets of the opponent. (See reasons, point 12.2)
4. (a) In the absence of such evidence, the transfer of an opponent's business assets to two separate persons cannot give either of them the right to take over and conduct opposition or opposition appeal proceedings. (See reasons, point 7.6)
(b) When such evidence is present, only the transferee established by such evidence can acquire such a right. (See reasons, point 7.6)
- Relevant legal provisions
- European Patent Convention Art 107 1973European Patent Convention Art 108 1973European Patent Convention Art 110 1973European Patent Convention Art 113 1973European Patent Convention Art 116 1973European Patent Convention Art 133 1973European Patent Convention Art 99 1973European Patent Convention R 64 1973European Patent Convention R 65 1973
- Keywords
- Admissibility of appeal (no)
Party adversely affected not the party filing Grounds of Appeal
Commercial interest insufficient to remedy deficiency in admissibility - Catchword
- -
ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that:
The appeal is dismissed as inadmissible.