J 0009/92 (Re-establishment) du 04.09.1992

Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence: ECLI:EP:BA:1992:J000992.19920904
Date de la décision: 4 septembre 1992
Numéro de l'affaire: J 0009/92
Requête en révision de: -
Numéro de la demande: 89907243.3
Classe de la CIB: -
Langue de la procédure: Anglais
Distribution: Distribuées aux présidents et aux membres des chambres de recours (B)
Téléchargement: Décision en anglais
Versions JO: Aucun lien JO trouvé
Autres décisions pour cet affaire: -
Résumés pour cette décision: -
Titre de la demande: -
Nom du demandeur: Decknology Ltd.
Nom de l'opposant: -
Chambre: 3.1.01
Sommaire: -
Dispositions juridiques pertinentes: European Patent Convention Art 112(1)(a) 1973 European Patent Convention Art 122 1973 European Patent Convention Art 122(1) 1973 European Patent Convention Art 122(2) 1973 European Patent Convention Art 122(3) 1973 European Patent Convention Art 122(5) 1973 European Patent Convention Art 150 1973 European Patent Convention Art 158 1973 European Patent Convention Art 78(2) 1973 European Patent Convention Art 79(3) 1973 European Patent Convention Art 94 1973 European Patent Convention R 85b 1973Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 9
Mots-clés: Extent of applicability of Article 122(5) EPC; supplementary referral to J 0016/90 - Fabritius, G 0003/91
Referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal
Applicability of the decision of the Enlarged Board of Appeal - pending cases
Exergue: -
Affaires citées: G 0003/89 G 0003/91 G 0011/91 J 0015/90 J 0016/90 J 0008/91 J 0009/92 J 0020/92 T 0184/91
Affaires citantes: J 0009/92

ORDER

For these reasons, it is decided that:

1. In appeals J 15/90, J 8/91, J 9/92 and J 20/92 the same questions are referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal with the same reasoning as in case J 16/90 (G 3/91).

2. In addition the following question is referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal:

If the answer to the questions of law 1b or 2b is negative, that is re-establishment is precluded in the relevant PCT cases, is the decision of the Enlarged Board of Appeal then also immediately applicable to all pending cases?