T 0396/06 du 26.01.2009
- Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
- ECLI:EP:BA:2009:T039606.20090126
- Date de la décision
- 26 janvier 2009
- Numéro de l'affaire
- T 0396/06
- Requête en révision de
- -
- Numéro de la demande
- 96922326.2
- Classe de la CIB
- C30B 29/36
- Langue de la procédure
- Anglais
- Distribution
- Non distribuées (D)
- Téléchargement
- Décision en anglais
- Versions JO
- Aucun lien JO trouvé
- Autres décisions pour cet affaire
- -
- Résumés pour cette décision
- -
- Titre de la demande
- A device and a method for epitaxially growing objects by CVD
- Nom du demandeur
- Norstel AB
- Nom de l'opposant
- L P E S.p.a.
- Chambre
- 3.2.07
- Sommaire
- -
- Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
- European Patent Convention Art 100(b) 1973European Patent Convention Art 100(c) 1973European Patent Convention Art 123(2)European Patent Convention Art 123(3)European Patent Convention Art 54 1973European Patent Convention Art 56 1973European Patent Convention Art 83 1973European Patent Convention Art 84 1973Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 12Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13
- Mots-clés
- Subject-matter extends beyond content of application as originally filed (main and auxiliary request I - yes; auxiliary requests II to VII - no)
Sufficiency of disclosure (auxiliary request II - no)
Novelty (auxiliary request III - no; auxiliary request VII - yes)
Clarity (auxiliary requests IV to VI - no)
Inventive step (auxiliary request VII - yes)
"Amendment to the appellant's case" (not allowed) - Exergue
- -
- Affaires citantes
- -
ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. The decision under appeal is set aside.
2. The case is remitted to the department of first instance, with the order to maintain the patent on the basis of:
- claims 1 to 17 filed as auxiliary request VII during the oral proceedings;
- description pages 2 to 5 filed during the oral proceedings; and
- Figures 1 to 3 of the patent as granted.