T 0756/09 (Fluid flow simulation/MOLDFLOW) du 18.03.2015
- Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
- ECLI:EP:BA:2015:T075609.20150318
- Date de la décision
- 18 mars 2015
- Numéro de l'affaire
- T 0756/09
- Requête en révision de
- -
- Numéro de la demande
- 98905149.5
- Classe de la CIB
- B29C 45/76G06T 17/20B29C 33/00G06F 17/13B29C 45/02G06F 17/50
- Langue de la procédure
- Anglais
- Distribution
- Non distribuées (D)
- Téléchargement
- Décision en anglais
- Versions JO
- Aucun lien JO trouvé
- Autres décisions pour cet affaire
- -
- Résumés pour cette décision
- -
- Titre de la demande
- Method for modelling three-dimensional objects and simulation of fluid flow
- Nom du demandeur
- Moldflow Pty. Ltd.
- Nom de l'opposant
- Dassault Systèmes SA
- Chambre
- 3.5.07
- Sommaire
- -
- Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
- European Patent Convention Art 100(c)European Patent Convention Art 104(1)European Patent Convention Art 123(2)European Patent Convention Art 123(3)European Patent Convention Art 56European Patent Convention Art 83European Patent Convention Art 84European Patent Convention R 88(1)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 16
- Mots-clés
- Late-filed argument - admitted (yes)
Grounds for opposition - added subject-matter (yes)
Oral proceedings - request for continuation of proceedings in writing
Oral proceedings - request for further oral proceedings
Amendment occasioned by ground for opposition - late-filed request (admitted)
Amendment occasioned by ground for opposition - amendments allowable (yes)
Apportionment of costs - (no) - Exergue
- -
- Affaires citantes
- -
Order
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. The decision under appeal is set aside.
2. The case is remitted to the department of first instance with the order to maintain the patent in amended form on the basis of the following documents:
Description:
pages 3, 4 and 5 as submitted in the oral proceedings on 18 March 2015,
pages 2, 6, 7, 8 and 9 of the patent specification;
Claims:
1 to 34 of the main request submitted at 15:00 in the oral proceedings on 18 March 2015;
Drawings:
figures 1 to 17 of the patent specification.
3. The respondent's request for an apportionment of costs is refused.