T 1843/09 du 06.06.2012
- Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
- ECLI:EP:BA:2012:T184309.20120606
- Date de la décision
- 6 juin 2012
- Numéro de l'affaire
- T 1843/09
- Requête en révision de
- -
- Numéro de la demande
- 93306378.6
- Classe de la CIB
- B32B 27/20C08J 15/28C08L 67/02
- Langue de la procédure
- Anglais
- Distribution
- Publiées au Journal officiel de l'OEB (A)
- Téléchargement
- Décision en anglais
- Autres décisions pour cet affaire
- -
- Résumés pour cette décision
- -
- Titre de la demande
- Biaxially oriented film
- Nom du demandeur
- TORAY INDUSTRIES, INC.
- Nom de l'opposant
- Teijin Limited
- Chambre
- 3.3.09
- Sommaire
The prohibition of reformatio in peius as far as it entails a procedural limitation of the proprietor's liberty to change by way of amendments the scope of protection sought prevails "in principle" (G 4/93) until the final settlement of the opposition case and, therefore, also in any proceedings, including further appeal proceedings, subsequent to a remittal under Article 111 EPC (point 2.3.1 of the reasons).
It is clear from G 1/99 that exceptions from the principle of the prohibition of reformatio in peius are a matter of equity in order to protect the non-appealing proprietor against procedural discrimination in circumstances where that prohibition would impair the legitimate defence of its patent. Therefore, exceptions from the prohibition of reformatio in peius are not limited to the situation specifically dealt with in G 1/99, where an error of judgment by the opposition division occurred concerning an amendment introduced into the version of the patent as maintained by the decision under appeal (point 2.4.4 of the reasons).
- Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
- European Patent Convention Art 107European Patent Convention Art 111European Patent Convention Art 125European Patent Convention Art 56European Patent Convention R 80
- Mots-clés
- Exceptions from the prohibition of reformatio in peius
Inventive step (no) - Exergue
- -
ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. The decision under appeal is set aside.
2. The patent is revoked.