European Patent Office

T 0882/17 du 21.06.2022

Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
ECLI:EP:BA:2022:T088217.20220621
Date de la décision
21 juin 2022
Numéro de l'affaire
T 0882/17
Requête en révision de
-
Numéro de la demande
12161435.8
Classe de la CIB
A61B 19/00
Langue de la procédure
Anglais
Distribution
Distribuées aux présidents des chambres de recours (C)
Téléchargement
Décision en anglais
Versions JO
Aucun lien JO trouvé
Autres décisions pour cet affaire
-
Résumés pour cette décision
-
Titre de la demande
Surgical planning
Nom du demandeur
KINGS COLLEGE LONDON
DePuy International Limited
Nom de l'opposant
Calibre Search Ltd.
Chambre
3.2.02
Sommaire
-
Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
European Patent Convention Art 106(2)European Patent Convention Art 54European Patent Convention Art 56European Patent Convention R 99(2)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 012(2)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 013(2)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 12(2)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 12(4)
Mots-clés
Admissibility of appeal - appeal sufficiently substantiated (yes)
Admissibility of opposition
Appeal decision - extent of examination
Appeal decision - reformatio in peius
Late-filed evidence - submitted shortly before oral proceedings
Late-filed evidence - admitted (no)
Novelty - (yes)
Inventive step - (yes)
Exergue
If the opponent is the sole appellant against an interlocutory decision maintaining a patent in amended form, an objection related to the inadmissibility of the opposition is subject to the principle of the prohibition of reformatio in peius. In such a procedural situation, the Board is prohibited from ordering the maintenance of the patent as granted due to the inadmissibility of the opposition (Reasons 3.19).

Order

For these reasons it is decided that:

The appeal is dismissed.