T 1938/09 (TRANSDERMAL DELIVERY OF BUPRENORPHINE / EURO-CELTIQUE) du 09.03.2015
- Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
- ECLI:EP:BA:2015:T193809.20150309
- Date de la décision
- 9 mars 2015
- Numéro de l'affaire
- T 1938/09
- Requête en révision de
- -
- Numéro de la demande
- 98906678.2
- Classe de la CIB
- A61K 9/70A61K 31/485A61F 13/00
- Langue de la procédure
- Anglais
- Distribution
- Distribuées aux présidents des chambres de recours (C)
- Téléchargement
- Décision en anglais
- Versions JO
- Aucun lien JO trouvé
- Autres décisions pour cet affaire
- T 1938/09 Objection for suspicion of partiality 2014-10-02
- Résumés pour cette décision
- -
- Titre de la demande
- SUSTAINED ANALGESIA ACHIEVED WITH TRANSDERMAL DELIVERY OF BUPRENORPHINE
- Nom du demandeur
- EURO-CELTIQUE S.A.
- Nom de l'opposant
- Hexal AG
Acino AG - Chambre
- 3.3.02
- Sommaire
- -
- Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
- Basic proposal for the revision of the EPC MR/2/00European Patent Convention Art 112a(2)(c)European Patent Convention Art 112a(3)European Patent Convention Art 114(2)European Patent Convention Art 116(4)European Patent Convention Art 123(2)European Patent Convention Art 24European Patent Convention Art 54(2)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 15(2)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 3(2)
- Mots-clés
- Admissibility of objection of partiality (yes) - No delay and sufficient substantiation
Admissibility of auxiliary requests (yes) - Bona fide attemps to remedy newly raised deficiencies
Admissibility of auxiliary requests (no) - Not clearly allowable and raising complex problems at late stage
Postponement of oral proceedings because of pending petition for review of a decision rejecting an objection based on suspected partiality (no) - No suspensive effect
Referral of questions to the Enlarged Board of Appeal (no)
Amendments - extension beyond the content of the application as filed (yes)
Claims - clarity after amendment (no) - Exergue
- -
- Affaires citantes
- R 0016/22
Order
For these reasons it is decided that:
The appeal is dismissed.