T 1033/10 du 21.03.2013
- Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
- ECLI:EP:BA:2013:T103310.20130321
- Date de la décision
- 21 mars 2013
- Numéro de l'affaire
- T 1033/10
- Requête en révision de
- -
- Numéro de la demande
- 01915675.1
- Classe de la CIB
- F01N 3/28
- Langue de la procédure
- Anglais
- Distribution
- Distribuées aux présidents et aux membres des chambres de recours (B)
- Téléchargement
- Décision en anglais
- Versions JO
- Aucun lien JO trouvé
- Autres décisions pour cet affaire
- -
- Résumés pour cette décision
- -
- Titre de la demande
- Holding and sealing mat material
- Nom du demandeur
- IBIDEN CO., LTD.
- Nom de l'opposant
- 3M Innovative Properties Company
- Chambre
- 3.2.06
- Sommaire
- -
- Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
- European Patent Convention Art 123(2)European Patent Convention Art 84Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13(1)
- Mots-clés
- Main request and first, third and fifth auxiliary requests - clarity (no)
Final set of requests not admitted - state of the proceedings and procedural economy - Exergue
- The state of the proceedings and the need for procedural economy taken together imply a requirement on a party to present appropriate requests as soon as possible if such requests are to be admitted and considered. (point 5.5)
If an objection (made by a party and/or by the Board) is not fully understood in a particular case, it is then, at the very least, incumbent on the party having difficulties with understanding an objection to indicate this at the earliest possible stage and make appropriate effort to have the objection clarified. A lack of understanding alone cannot justify postponing amendments to a party's case until a later stage in the proceedings.(point 5.9) - Affaires citées
- -
Order
For these reasons it is decided that:
The appeal is dismissed.