T 1707/17 du 19.02.2021
- Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
- ECLI:EP:BA:2021:T170717.20210219
- Date de la décision
- 19 février 2021
- Numéro de l'affaire
- T 1707/17
- Requête en révision de
- -
- Numéro de la demande
- 05794506.5
- Classe de la CIB
- H01J 37/32
- Langue de la procédure
- Anglais
- Distribution
- Distribuées aux présidents des chambres de recours (C)
- Téléchargement
- Décision en anglais
- Versions JO
- Aucun lien JO trouvé
- Autres décisions pour cet affaire
- -
- Résumés pour cette décision
- -
- Titre de la demande
- MATERIAL DEPOSITION APPARATUS AND METHOD
- Nom du demandeur
- Applied Multilayers LLC
- Nom de l'opposant
- -
- Chambre
- 3.4.03
- Sommaire
- -
- Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
- European Patent Convention Art 123(2) (2007)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13(1) (2020)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13(2) (2020)
- Mots-clés
- Amendments of main and 1st auxiliary request
Amendments - allowable (no)
Amendment after summons (2nd auxiliary request)
Amendment after summons - taken into account (no) - Exergue
- Article 13(2) RPBA 2020 requires the party
not only to explain why the case involves exceptional circumstances, but also to explain why its amendment, in terms of both content and timing, represents a justified response to these circumstances.
In particular, where a party seeks to amend its case at a very late stage in the proceedings, the cogent reasons referred to in Article 13(2) RPBA 2020 should include reasons why it was not possible to file such an amendment earlier (Reasons, point
2.4). - Affaires citées
- T 1033/10
Order
For these reasons it is decided that:
The appeal is dismissed.