T 1439/16 du 02.09.2020
- Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
- ECLI:EP:BA:2020:T143916.20200902
- Date de la décision
- 2 septembre 2020
- Numéro de l'affaire
- T 1439/16
- Requête en révision de
- -
- Numéro de la demande
- 09169230.1
- Classe de la CIB
- H02K 7/10B65G 23/08
- Langue de la procédure
- Anglais
- Distribution
- Non distribuées (D)
- Téléchargement
- Décision en anglais
- Versions JO
- Aucun lien JO trouvé
- Autres décisions pour cet affaire
- -
- Résumés pour cette décision
- -
- Titre de la demande
- Motorized roller and motor unit for motorized roller
- Nom du demandeur
- Itoh Denki Co., Ltd.
- Nom de l'opposant
- Interroll Holding AG
EBM-PAPST ST. GEORGEN GmbH & Co. KG - Chambre
- 3.2.07
- Sommaire
- -
- Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
- European Patent Convention Art 113(1) (2007)European Patent Convention Art 123(2) (2007)European Patent Convention Art 54 (2007)European Patent Convention Art 56 (2007)European Patent Convention Art 70(1) (2007)European Patent Convention R 115(2) (2007)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 11 (2020)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 12(2) (2007)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 12(2) (2020)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 12(3) (2020)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13(1) (2020)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13(3) (2007)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 15(1) (2007)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 15(3) (2020)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 25(1) (2020)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 25(3) (2020)
- Mots-clés
- Oral proceedings - non-attendance of party
Late-filed auxiliary requests - amendments after arrangement of oral proceedings
Late-filed auxiliary requests - admitted (yes)
Late-filed argument - amendments at the oral proceedings
Late-filed argument - admitted (no)
Late-filed argument - procedural economy
Novelty - (yes)
Inventive step - (yes) - Exergue
- -
- Affaires citées
- -
Order
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. The decision under appeal is set aside.
2. The case is remitted to the opposition division with the order to maintain the patent with the following claims and a description to be adapted thereto:
No. 1 to 9 according to auxiliary request 6 filed with the letter dated 30 December 2019.