T 2710/17 du 15.12.2020
- Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
- ECLI:EP:BA:2020:T271017.20201215
- Date de la décision
- 15 décembre 2020
- Numéro de l'affaire
- T 2710/17
- Requête en révision de
- -
- Numéro de la demande
- 12191349.5
- Classe de la CIB
- B23B 29/04B23B 27/10B23D 15/14B23D 33/00B23B 27/04
- Langue de la procédure
- Anglais
- Distribution
- Non distribuées (D)
- Téléchargement
- Décision en anglais
- Versions JO
- Aucun lien JO trouvé
- Autres décisions pour cet affaire
- -
- Résumés pour cette décision
- -
- Titre de la demande
- Cutting assembly
- Nom du demandeur
- KENNAMETAL INC.
- Nom de l'opposant
- KARL-HEINZ ARNOLD GmbH
Sandvik Intellectual Property AB - Chambre
- 3.2.01
- Sommaire
- -
- Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
- European Patent Convention Art 123(2) (2007)European Patent Convention Art 52(1) (2007)European Patent Convention Art 54 (2007)European Patent Convention Art 56 (2007)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 12(4) (2007)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13(1) (2020)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 25(2) (2020)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 25(3) (2020)
- Mots-clés
- Novelty - main request (no)
Amendments in an auxiliary request
Amendments - intermediate generalisation (yes)
Auxiliary requests not admitted because they could have been filed in the first instance proceedings (yes)
Amendment to appeal case - justification by party (yes)
Amendment to appeal case - amendment detrimental to procedural economy (no)
Amendment to appeal case - suitability of amendment to resolve issues raised (yes)
Inventive step - auxiliary request
Inventive step - (yes) - Exergue
- -
- Affaires citantes
- -
Order
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. The decision under appeal is set aside.
2. The case is remitted to the department of first instance with the order to maintain the patent in the following version:
Claims 1 to 12 of the auxiliary request 4 filed with the letter of 11 November 2020;
Figures and description as granted.