T 2391/18 du 19.04.2023
- Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
- ECLI:EP:BA:2023:T239118.20230419
- Date de la décision
- 19 avril 2023
- Numéro de l'affaire
- T 2391/18
- Requête en révision de
- -
- Numéro de la demande
- 06742598.3
- Classe de la CIB
- F27D 3/12F27D 3/00F27D 19/00C21C 5/56F27B 3/28C21B 13/12B65G 47/51C21C 5/52F27B 3/18
- Langue de la procédure
- Anglais
- Distribution
- Distribuées aux présidents des chambres de recours (C)
- Téléchargement
- Décision en anglais
- Versions JO
- Aucun lien JO trouvé
- Autres décisions pour cet affaire
- -
- Résumés pour cette décision
- Résumé de EPC2000 Art 084
- Titre de la demande
- EQUIPMENT FOR MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL OF LOAD MATERIAL OR SCRAP FEEDING INTO A FURNACE AND RELATIVE METHOD
- Nom du demandeur
- Tenova S.p.A.
- Nom de l'opposant
- DANIELI & C.
OFFICINE MECCANICHE SpA - Chambre
- 3.2.03
- Sommaire
- -
- Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
- European Patent Convention Art 100(c)European Patent Convention Art 115European Patent Convention Art 123(2)European Patent Convention Art 54European Patent Convention Art 56European Patent Convention Art 84European Patent Convention R 80Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 013(1)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 013(2)
- Mots-clés
- Novelty - (yes)
Inventive step - (yes)
Grounds for opposition - subject-matter extends beyond content of earlier application (no)
Amendments - allowable (yes)
Observations by third parties - legal position of third party
Observations by third parties - relevant (no)
Observations by third parties - admissibility of a new document (no)
Amendment to appeal case - justification by party (no)
Amendment after summons - exceptional circumstances (no)
Amendment after summons - taken into account (no)
Amendment after summons - cogent reasons (no) - Exergue
- On the application of Rule 80 EPC and the findings of the Enlarged Board of Appeal in G
3/14 in case of an alleged discrepancy between the description and a feature stemming from a granted claim, see point 4.
Order
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. The decision under appeal is set aside.
2. The case is remitted to the Opposition Division with the order to maintain the patent as amended in the following version.
Description:
Columns 1 to 7 received during oral proceedings before the Board of Appeal on 19 April 2023.
Claims:
No. 1 to 8 according to the third auxiliary request, filed on 5 April 2019 with the reply to the statement of grounds of appeal.
Drawings of the patent specification.