T 1901/22 du 03.05.2024
- Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
- ECLI:EP:BA:2024:T190122.20240503
- Date de la décision
- 3 mai 2024
- Numéro de l'affaire
- T 1901/22
- Requête en révision de
- -
- Numéro de la demande
- 16770591.2
- Classe de la CIB
- B42D 25/00
- Langue de la procédure
- Anglais
- Distribution
- Non distribuées (D)
- Téléchargement
- Décision en anglais
- Versions JO
- Aucun lien JO trouvé
- Autres décisions pour cet affaire
- -
- Résumés pour cette décision
- -
- Titre de la demande
- Single or dual transfer process for preparing and transfering sharply defined single elements to objects to be protected
- Nom du demandeur
- Crane Security Technologies, Inc.
Visual Physics, LLC - Nom de l'opposant
- Giesecke+Devrient Currency Technology GmbH
Leonhard Kurz Stiftung & Co. KG - Chambre
- 3.2.05
- Sommaire
- -
- Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
- European Patent Convention Art 100(a)European Patent Convention Art 111(1)European Patent Convention Art 111(2)European Patent Convention Art 54European Patent Convention Art 84European Patent Convention R 111(2)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 011Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 012(3)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 012(5)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 012(6)
- Mots-clés
- Ground for opposition - lack of novelty (yes)
Statement of grounds of appeal - reasons set out clearly and concisely (no)
Statement of grounds of appeal - auxiliary requests 1, 6, 7, 8 and 9 admitted (no)
Appealed decision - auxiliary requests 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 11 and 12
Appealed decision - sufficiently reasoned (no)
Appealed decision - auxiliary requests 10, 11 and 12
Appealed decision - error in the use of discretion (yes)
Late-filed auxiliary requests 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 11 and 12
Late-filed auxiliary requests - admitted in first-instance proceedings (no)
Late-filed auxiliary requests - admitted (yes)
Claims - auxiliary requests 2, 3, 4 and 5
Claims - clarity after amendment (no)
Remittal - fundamental deficiency in first-instance proceedings (yes)
Remittal - remittal to the department of first instance (yes)
Reimbursement of appeal fee - equitable by reason of a substantial procedural violation (no) - Exergue
- -
- Affaires citées
- J 0007/83
- Affaires citantes
- -
Order
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. The decision under appeal is set aside.
2. The case is remitted to the opposition division for further prosecution.
3. The request for reimbursement of the appeal fee is refused.