European Patent Office

T 0998/23 du 21.10.2024

Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
ECLI:EP:BA:2024:T099823.20241021
Date de la décision
21 octobre 2024
Numéro de l'affaire
T 0998/23
Requête en révision de
-
Numéro de la demande
10834964.8
Langue de la procédure
Anglais
Distribution
Non distribuées (D)
Téléchargement
Décision en anglais
Versions JO
Aucun lien JO trouvé
Autres décisions pour cet affaire
-
Résumés pour cette décision
-
Titre de la demande
METHOD OF MAKING A COATED ABRASIVE ARTICLE HAVING SHAPED ABRASIVE PARTICLES AND RESULTING PRODUCT
Nom du demandeur
3M Innovative Properties Company
Nom de l'opposant
Saint-Gobain Abrasives, Inc.
Chambre
3.2.07
Sommaire
-
Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
European Patent Convention Art 100(a)European Patent Convention Art 100(b)European Patent Convention Art 100(c)European Patent Convention Art 123(2)European Patent Convention Art 54European Patent Convention Art 56European Patent Convention Art 83European Patent Convention R 124(1)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 012(6)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 013(2)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 015(1)
Mots-clés
Late-filed objection - admitted in first-instance proceedings (no)
Late-filed objection - error in use of discretion at first instance (no)
Late-filed objection - admitted (no)
Grounds for opposition - insufficiency of disclosure (no)
Grounds for opposition - lack of patentability (no)
Sufficiency of disclosure - (yes)
Novelty - (yes)
Inventive step - (yes)
Minutes of oral proceedings - essentials of oral proceedings
Minutes of oral proceedings - request to record statement in the minutes (refused)
Amendment after notification of Art. 15(1) RPBA communication (yes)
Amendment after notification of Art. 15(1) RPBA communication - cogent reasons (no)
Amendment after notification of Art. 15(1) RPBA communication - exceptional circumstances (no)
Amendment after notification of Art. 15(1) RPBA communication - taken into account (no)
Exergue
-
Affaires citantes
-

Order

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside.

2. The patent is maintained as granted.