T 0081/87 (Preprorennin) du 24.01.1989
- Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
- ECLI:EP:BA:1989:T008187.19890124
- Date de la décision
- 24 janvier 1989
- Numéro de l'affaire
- T 0081/87
- Requête en révision de
- -
- Numéro de la demande
- 82100124.5
- Classe de la CIB
- C12N 15/00
- Langue de la procédure
- Anglais
- Distribution
- Publiées au Journal officiel de l'OEB (A)
- Téléchargement
- Décision en anglais
- Autres décisions pour cet affaire
- -
- Résumés pour cette décision
- -
- Titre de la demande
- -
- Nom du demandeur
- Collaborative
- Nom de l'opposant
- -
- Chambre
- 3.3.02
- Sommaire
In accordance with Article 87(1) EPC a European patent application is only entitled to priority in respect of the same invention as was disclosed in the previous application. This means that the subject-matter of the claims of the European application must be clearly identifiable in the previous application as a whole. Identical wording is not required. In order to give rise to priority the disclosure of all the essential elements, i.e. features of the invention in the priority document must either be express, or be directly and unambiguously implied by the text as filed. Missing elements which are to be recognised as essential only later on, are thus not part of the disclosure.
- Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
- European Patent Convention Art 54(3) 1973European Patent Convention Art 83 1973European Patent Convention Art 84 1973European Patent Convention Art 87(1) 1973European Patent Convention Art 88(4) 1973
- Mots-clés
- Priority - missing essential features
Priority - same invention in previous and subsequent application
Sufficiency - inclusion of future invention
Novelty - enabling disclosure - Exergue
- -
- Affaires citées
- -
- Affaires citantes
- T 0957/91T 0223/92T 0242/92T 0469/92T 0923/92T 1054/92T 0026/93T 0296/93T 0767/93T 0828/93T 0850/93T 0869/93T 0380/94T 0386/94T 0413/94T 0476/94T 0620/94T 0051/95T 0193/95T 0277/95T 0077/97T 0188/97T 0400/97T 0479/97T 0161/98T 0342/98T 0120/00T 0179/01T 1228/01T 0843/03T 0020/04T 1399/04T 0070/05T 0080/05T 1834/09T 0557/13T 1434/13T 1630/19
ORDER
For these reasons, it is decided that:
1.The impugned decision of the Examining Division is set aside.
2.The case is remitted to the Examining Division with the order to continue prosecution of the application on the basis of the claims presented in all requests at the oral hearing.