T 0598/91 (Tyre) du 03.06.1993
- Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
- ECLI:EP:BA:1993:T059891.19930603
- Date de la décision
- 3 juin 1993
- Numéro de l'affaire
- T 0598/91
- Requête en révision de
- -
- Numéro de la demande
- 86202065.8
- Classe de la CIB
- B29D 30/38B29D 30/26
- Langue de la procédure
- Anglais
- Distribution
- Publiées au Journal officiel de l'OEB (A)
- Téléchargement
- Décision en anglais
- Autres décisions pour cet affaire
- -
- Résumés pour cette décision
- -
- Titre de la demande
- A device for supplying and stitching a belt plus tread onto the carcass for manufacturing a pneumatic tyre
- Nom du demandeur
- VMI EPE
- Nom de l'opposant
- Krupp
- Chambre
- 3.2.02
- Sommaire
Article 133 EPC does not exclude the possibility of pleading by an assistant at oral proceedings in technical or legal matters, in addition to pleading by the professional representative, the authorised employee or the party himself, where he is a natural person, provided that the Board and the party for which the assistant speaks have given their permission and the representative, employee or person continues to supervise the proceedings and bears full responsibility (cf. point 2.2 distinguishing T 80/84).
- Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
- European Patent Convention Art 133 1973European Patent Convention Art 134 1973European Patent Convention Art 54 1973European Patent Convention Art 56 1973
- Mots-clés
- Representation and pleading; assistance at oral proceedings
Novelty (yes)
Inventive step (yes) - Exergue
- -
- Affaires citées
- -
ORDER
For these reasons, it is decided that:
1. The decision under appeal is set aside.
2. The case is remitted to the first instance with the order to maintain the patent on the basis of the documents indicated in point IX above.