T 1051/92 du 26.04.1994
- Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
- ECLI:EP:BA:1994:T105192.19940426
- Date de la décision
- 26 avril 1994
- Numéro de l'affaire
- T 1051/92
- Requête en révision de
- -
- Numéro de la demande
- 87300326.3
- Classe de la CIB
- B65D 81/20B65D 30/08B32B 15/08
- Langue de la procédure
- Anglais
- Distribution
- Distribuées aux présidents et aux membres des chambres de recours (B)
- Téléchargement
- Décision en anglais
- Versions JO
- Aucun lien JO trouvé
- Autres décisions pour cet affaire
- -
- Résumés pour cette décision
- -
- Titre de la demande
- Package of smooth appearance, method of making thereof and roll of web product for forming it
- Nom du demandeur
- Fres-Co System USA, Inc.
- Nom de l'opposant
- Scheuch GmbH & Co. KG
Wipf AG Verpackungen
Rhône-Poulenc Multi-Techniques - Chambre
- 3.2.01
- Sommaire
- -
- Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
- European Patent Convention Art 113 1973European Patent Convention Art 116 1973European Patent Convention Art 54 1973European Patent Convention Art 56 1973European Patent Convention R 67 1973
- Mots-clés
- Novelty (yes)
Inventive step (yes), substantial procedural violation (no)
Reimbursement of the appeal fee (no) - Exergue
- The right to oral proceedings is not restricted to the submission of "substantial new arguments" at such proceedings. However, the mere information provided by the Opposition Division in a communication that in case the Opponent did not submit new arguments at the oral proceedings he would run the risk of having to pay costs incurred by the Patentee, cannot be considered as constituting a substantial procedural violation.
- Affaires citantes
- -
ORDER
For these reasons, it is decided that:
1. The decision under appeal is set aside.
2. The case is remitted to the first instance with the order to maintain the patent with the Claims 1 to 7 and the description columns 1 to 5 presented at the oral proceedings together with the drawings as granted.
3. The request for reimbursement of the appeal fee is rejected.