T 0241/95 (Serotonin receptor/ELI LILLY) du 14.06.2000
- Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
- ECLI:EP:BA:2000:T024195.20000614
- Date de la décision
- 14 juin 2000
- Numéro de l'affaire
- T 0241/95
- Requête en révision de
- -
- Numéro de la demande
- 91302599.5
- Classe de la CIB
- A61K 31/135
- Langue de la procédure
- Anglais
- Distribution
- Publiées au Journal officiel de l'OEB (A)
- Téléchargement
- Décision en anglais
- Autres décisions pour cet affaire
- -
- Résumés pour cette décision
- -
- Titre de la demande
- Use of R-Fluoxetine as selective serotonin IC-receptor ligands
- Nom du demandeur
- ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
- Nom de l'opposant
- -
- Chambre
- 3.3.02
- Sommaire
I. The selective occupation of a receptor cannot be considered in itself as a therapeutic application; the discovery that a substance selectively binds a receptor, even if representing an important piece of scientific knowledge, still needs to find a practical application in the form of a defined, real treatment of any pathological condition in order to make a technical contribution to the art and to be considered as an invention eligible for patent protection (see reasons, point 3.1.2).
II. When a claim is directed to a further therapeutic application of a medicament and the condition to be treated is defined in functional terms, e.g. any condition susceptible of being improved or prevented by selective occupation of a specific receptor, the claim can be regarded as clear only if instructions, in the form of experimental tests or any testable criteria, are available from the patent documents or from the common general knowledge allowing the skilled person to recognise which conditions fall within the functional definition and accordingly within the scope of the claim (see reasons, point 3.1.1) (following T 68/85, Synergistic herbicides/ CIBA-GEIGY, OJ EPO 1987, 228).
- Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
- European Patent Convention Art 111(1) 1973European Patent Convention Art 54 1973European Patent Convention Art 84 1973
- Mots-clés
- Main request: clarity of the functional definition (no)
First auxiliary request: novelty (no); therapeutic effect already described in animals
Second auxiliary request: specific diseases never considered by the Examining Division - remittal to the department of first instance - Exergue
- -
ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. The decision under appeal is set aside,
2. The case is remitted to the department of first instance for further prosecution on the basis of the second auxiliary request as submitted during the oral proceedings.