T 0167/97 (Admissibility) du 16.11.1998
- Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
- ECLI:EP:BA:1998:T016797.19981116
- Date de la décision
- 16 novembre 1998
- Numéro de l'affaire
- T 0167/97
- Requête en révision de
- -
- Numéro de la demande
- 90304778.5
- Classe de la CIB
- B23D 65/00
- Langue de la procédure
- Anglais
- Distribution
- Publiées au Journal officiel de l'OEB (A)
- Téléchargement
- Décision en anglais
- Autres décisions pour cet affaire
- -
- Résumés pour cette décision
- -
- Titre de la demande
- -
- Nom du demandeur
- NN AG
- Nom de l'opposant
- YY GmbH
- Chambre
- 3.2.02
- Sommaire
1. The requirement of Article 122(2), second sentence, EPC that the "omitted act" must be completed within the prescribed period implies that the completed act also must meet the requirements of the EPC - ie in the present case that the statement of grounds of appeal is admissible for the purpose of Article 108, last sentence, EPC.
2. Where the statement of grounds filed with the request for re-establishment is insufficient for the appeal to be declared admissible, the request for re-establishment must itself be declared inadmissible.
- Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
- European Patent Convention Art 108 1973European Patent Convention Art 122 1973
- Mots-clés
- Re-establishment - inadmissible
Omitted act - inadmissible grounds of appeal
Appeal - inadmissible - Exergue
- -
ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. The request for re-establishment is rejected as inadmissible.
2. The appeal is rejected as inadmissible.