European Patent Office

W 0053/91 (Second invitation) du 19.02.1992

Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
ECLI:EP:BA:1992:W005391.19920219
Date de la décision
19 février 1992
Numéro de l'affaire
W 0053/91
Requête en révision de
-
Numéro de la demande
-
Classe de la CIB
A61K 31/16
Langue de la procédure
Anglais
Distribution
Non distribuées (D)
Téléchargement
Décision en anglais
Versions JO
Aucun lien JO trouvé
Autres décisions pour cet affaire
-
Résumés pour cette décision
-
Titre de la demande
Pharmacologically active amide carboxylate derivatives
Nom du demandeur
-
Nom de l'opposant
-
Chambre
3.3.02
Sommaire
-
Mots-clés
PCT protests - appeals by analogy - suspensive effect of protest - subsequent incompetence of ISA
Second invitation null and void ab initio
Exergue
1. The provisions of the EPC on appeals and appeal procedure are based on generally recognised principles of procedural law. Appeals under the EPC are decided by a separate instance, the Boards of Appeal (Article 21 EPC). Protests under the PCT are also to be examined by a separate instance (Rule 40.2(c) PCT). By analogy, protest cases are therefore to be considered and treated as appeals within the framework of the provisions of the EPC on appeals and appeals procedure, provided that no conflict arises between the two treaties.
2. Given the analogy between protests under the PCT and appeals under the EPC, an invitation against which a protest has been lodged cannot validly be replaced by a second invitation.
Affaires citées
-

ORDER

For these reasons, it is ordered that:

1. The invitation of 1 October 1991 is declared null and void ab initio.

2. The reimbursement of the fees paid under protest with regard to the invitation of 1 October 1991 is ordered.