Information
Cette page n'est disponible qu'en Anglais.
Recently published decisions 2025
All board of appeal decisions released for publication in the last three months are shown in the list below (newest first). The website checks for new decisions daily and updates the list accordingly. For full lists per year, please access the subpages.
March 2025
Grounds for opposition - lack of patentability (yes)
Amendment after notification of Art. 15(1) RPBA communication - cogent reasons (no)
Late-filed request - admitted in first-instance proceedings (no) - admitted (yes)
Novelty - (yes)
Erfinderische Tätigkeit - Hauptantrag (nein)
Erfinderische Tätigkeit - naheliegende Kombination bekannter Merkmale
Spät eingereichter Antrag - im erstinstanzlichen Verfahren zugelassen (nein)
Spät eingereichter Antrag - Ermessensfehler in erster Instanz (nein)
Spät eingereichter Antrag - zugelassen (nein)
Entscheidung im schriftlichen Verfahren
Erfinderische Tätigkeit - (ja)
1. The requirement for immediate and complete substantiation of a request for re-establishment corresponds to the principle of "Eventualmaxime/Häufungsgrundsatz/le principe de la concentration des moyens", according to which the request must state all grounds for re-establishment and means of evidence without the possibility of submitting these at a later stage.
2. Dynamic interpretation of the EPC, as derived from Articles 31(1) and 31(3) Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, must take account of developments in national and international procedural law, notably as regards the guarantees of fair trial before a tribunal of law (Article 6(1) ECHR).
3. There is no "absolute" right to oral proceedings upon a party's request, but it is subject to inherent restrictions by the EPC, and due to procedural principles generally recognised in the Contracting States of the EPO.
4. If oral proceedings do not serve any legitimate purpose, the requirement of legal certainty in due time prevents the Board from appointing them.
5. It is not the purpose of oral proceedings in the context of proceedings for re-establishment to give the appellant a further chance to substantiate their factual assertions or to provide evidence despite the absence of factual assertions in the request for re-establishment.
Re-establishment of rights - (no)
Re-establishment of rights - time limit for filing notice and statement of grounds
Re-establishment of rights - cross-check (no)
Re-establishment of rights - request not duly substantiated
Re-establishment of rights - all due care (no)
Re-establishment of rights - due care on the part of the professional representative and their assistants
Re-establishment of rights - supervision (no)
Admissibility of appeal - statement of grounds
Admissibility of appeal - filed within time limit (no)
Oral proceedings - before board of appeal
Oral proceedings - right to be heard in oral proceedings
Oral proceedings - request for oral proceedings
Amendment after notification of Art. 15(1) RPBA communication - exceptional circumstances (no)
Inventive step - (yes)
Erfinderische Tätigkeit - (nein)
Änderung des Vorbringens - Änderung zugelassen (ja)
Amendment after notification of Art. 15(1) RPBA communication - taken into account (no)
Amendments - added subject-matter (no)
Claims - clarity (yes)
Inventive step - (yes)
Inventive step - problem and solution approach
Novelty - after amendment
Inventive step - (no)