G 0001/21 (Exclusion and objection) of 17.05.2021
- European Case Law Identifier
- ECLI:EP:BA:2021:G000121.20210517
- Date of decision
- 17 May 2021
- Case number
- G 0001/21
- Petition for review of
- T 1807/15 2021-03-12
- Application number
- 04758381.0
- IPC class
- H03F 1/02
- Language of proceedings
- English
- Distribution
- Distributed to board chairmen and members (B)
- Download
- Decision in English
- OJ versions
- No OJ links found
- Other decisions for this case
- G 0001/21 Exclusion and objection 2021-05-28G 0001/21 Mündliche Verhandlung in Form einer Videokonferenz 2021-07-16G 0001/21 Oral proceedings by videoconference 2021-07-16G 0001/21 Oral proceedings by videoconference 2021-07-16G 0001/21 Procédure orale par visioconférence 2021-07-16
- Abstracts for this decision
- -
- Application title
- DOHERTY AMPLIFIER WITH OUTPUT HYBRID COUPLER
- Applicant name
- Andrew AG
- Opponent name
- Rohde & Schwarz GmbH & Co KG
- Board
- -
- Headnote
- -
- Relevant legal provisions
- Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms Art 6(1)ECHR: McGonnell v. the United Kingdom (8 February 2000 - 28488/95)ECHR: Procola v. Luxemburg (28 September 1995 - 14570/89)European Patent Convention Art 24(2)European Patent Convention Art 24(3)European Patent Convention Art 24(4)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 15a
- Keywords
- -
- Catchword
- -
- Citing cases
- G 0002/21R 0007/22R 0004/24J 0006/22T 1499/16T 1870/16T 2125/16T 2440/16T 0541/17T 1198/17T 1259/17T 1296/17T 1869/17T 2078/17T 2186/17T 2474/17T 0245/18T 0779/18T 0934/18T 1197/18T 1629/18T 2030/18T 2825/18T 0158/19T 0245/19T 0247/19T 0250/19T 1066/19T 1791/19T 2432/19T 2526/19T 2791/19T 2817/19T 0274/20T 0489/20T 0758/20T 1085/20T 1158/20T 1171/20T 1493/20T 1501/20T 1624/20T 0534/21T 0618/21T 0762/21T 0865/21T 1041/21T 2011/21T 0417/22T 0423/22T 0596/22T 1283/22T 0385/23T 0744/23T 0745/23T 0760/23T 0781/23T 0939/23T 1095/23T 1523/23T 1692/23T 1874/23
C. ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. The Chairman is replaced by Mr. F. Blumer.
2. The objection under Article 24(3) EPC against X and Y is rejected.
3. Z is replaced by Mr. T. Bokor.