G 0001/21 (Exclusion and objection) of 17.05.2021

European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EP:BA:2021:G000121.20210517
Date of decision: 17 May 2021
Case number: G 0001/21
Online on: 20 May 2021
Petition for review of: T 1807/15 of 02.12.2022
Application number: 04758381.0
IPC class: H03F 1/02
Language of proceedings: English
Distribution: Distributed to board chairmen and members (B)
Download: Decision in English
OJ versions: No OJ links found
Other decisions for this case: G 0001/21 Exclusion and objection 2021-05-28 G 0001/21 Mündliche Verhandlung in Form einer Videokonferenz 2021-07-16 G 0001/21 Oral proceedings by videoconference 2021-07-16 G 0001/21 Oral proceedings by videoconference 2021-07-16 G 0001/21 Procédure orale par visioconférence 2021-07-16
Abstracts for this decision: -
Application title: DOHERTY AMPLIFIER WITH OUTPUT HYBRID COUPLER
Applicant name: Andrew AG
Opponent name: Rohde & Schwarz GmbH & Co KG
Board: -
Headnote: -
Relevant legal provisions: European Patent Convention Art 24(2)European Patent Convention Art 24(3)European Patent Convention Art 24(4)Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms Art 6(1)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 15aECHR: McGonnell v. the United Kingdom (8 February 2000 - 28488/95)ECHR: Procola v. Luxemburg (28 September 1995 - 14570/89)
Keywords: -
Catchword: -
Cited cases: G 0002/08 G 0003/08
Citing cases: G 0002/21 R 0007/22 R 0016/23 R 0004/24 J 0006/22 T 1499/16 T 1870/16 T 2125/16 T 2440/16 T 0541/17 T 1198/17 T 1259/17 T 1296/17 T 1869/17 T 2078/17 T 2186/17 T 2474/17 T 0245/18 T 0779/18 T 0934/18 T 1197/18 T 1629/18 T 2030/18 T 2825/18 T 0158/19 T 0245/19 T 0247/19 T 0250/19 T 1066/19 T 1791/19 T 2432/19 T 2526/19 T 2791/19 T 2817/19 T 0274/20 T 0489/20 T 0758/20 T 1085/20 T 1158/20 T 1171/20 T 1493/20 T 1501/20 T 1624/20 T 0534/21 T 0618/21 T 0762/21 T 0865/21 T 1041/21 T 2011/21 T 0417/22 T 0423/22 T 0596/22 T 1283/22 T 0385/23 T 0744/23 T 0745/23 T 0760/23 T 0781/23 T 0939/23 T 1095/23 T 1523/23 T 1692/23 T 1874/23 T 1899/23

C. ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The Chairman is replaced by Mr. F. Blumer.

2. The objection under Article 24(3) EPC against X and Y is rejected.

3. Z is replaced by Mr. T. Bokor.