T 0144/09 vom 04.05.2011
- Europäischer Rechtsprechungsidentifikator
- ECLI:EP:BA:2011:T014409.20110504
- Datum der Entscheidung
- 4. Mai 2011
- Aktenzeichen
- T 0144/09
- Antrag auf Überprüfung von
- -
- Anmeldenummer
- 99113776.1
- IPC-Klasse
- B66B 11/00
- Verfahrenssprache
- Englisch
- Verteilung
- An die Kammervorsitzenden und -mitglieder verteilt (B)
- Download
- Entscheidung auf Englisch
- Amtsblattfassungen
- Keine AB-Links gefunden
- Weitere Entscheidungen für diese Akte
- -
- Zusammenfassungen für diese Entscheidung
- -
- Bezeichnung der Anmeldung
- Traction sheave elevator
- Name des Antragstellers
- Kone Corporation
- Name des Einsprechenden
- INVENTIO AG
ORONA E.I.C S. Coop.
Otis Elevator Company - Kammer
- 3.2.06
- Leitsatz
- -
- Relevante Rechtsnormen
- European Patent Convention Art 104(1)European Patent Convention Art 112(1)(a) 1973European Patent Convention Art 112aEuropean Patent Convention Art 113(1)European Patent Convention Art 113(2)European Patent Convention Art 123(2)European Patent Convention R 100(1)European Patent Convention R 106Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 12(4)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13(1)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 16(1)(e)
- Schlagwörter
- Main request and first, second, fourth and sixth auxiliary requests - not admitted (Art. 12(4) RPBA)
Third auxiliary request - added subject-matter (Art. 123(2) EPC)
Fifth auxiliary request - not admitted (Art. 13(1) RPBA)
Referral of question to Enlarged Board of Appeal - rejected
Objection under Rule 106 EPC - dismissed
Apportionment of costs - requests rejected - Orientierungssatz
- 1. A request can be held inadmissible under Article 12(4) RPBA when added subject-matter held unallowable during proceedings before the opposition division is not removed at least by way of an auxiliary request filed in those proceedings, but only by way of a request filed during the appeal proceedings (Reasons 1.4).
2. The applicability of Article 12(4) RPBA is not restricted by the time limit for filing the grounds of appeal or any reply thereto (Reasons 1.17). - Zitierende Akten
- T 1178/08T 0848/09T 0872/09T 0936/09T 1062/09T 2001/09T 1132/10T 1499/10T 1616/10T 0134/11T 0273/11T 0301/11T 0840/11T 1400/11T 2046/11T 2244/11T 2315/11T 2485/11T 0154/12T 0247/12T 1162/12T 2009/12T 2598/12T 0163/13T 1578/13T 1906/13T 0618/14T 0692/14T 0796/14T 1632/14T 0874/16T 2486/18T 2702/19
ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. The objection of the appellant under Rule 106 EPC is dismissed.
2. The request of the respondent/opponent OII for referral of a question to the Enlarged Board of Appeal is rejected.
3. The appeal is dismissed.
4. The requests of the opponents for apportionment of costs are rejected.