T 1938/09 (TRANSDERMAL DELIVERY OF BUPRENORPHINE / EURO-CELTIQUE) vom 09.03.2015
- Europäischer Rechtsprechungsidentifikator
- ECLI:EP:BA:2015:T193809.20150309
- Datum der Entscheidung
- 9. März 2015
- Aktenzeichen
- T 1938/09
- Antrag auf Überprüfung von
- -
- Anmeldenummer
- 98906678.2
- IPC-Klasse
- A61K 9/70A61K 31/485A61F 13/00
- Verfahrenssprache
- Englisch
- Verteilung
- An die Kammervorsitzenden verteilt (C)
- Download
- Entscheidung auf Englisch
- Amtsblattfassungen
- Keine AB-Links gefunden
- Weitere Entscheidungen für diese Akte
- T 1938/09 Objection for suspicion of partiality 2014-10-02
- Zusammenfassungen für diese Entscheidung
- -
- Bezeichnung der Anmeldung
- SUSTAINED ANALGESIA ACHIEVED WITH TRANSDERMAL DELIVERY OF BUPRENORPHINE
- Name des Antragstellers
- EURO-CELTIQUE S.A.
- Name des Einsprechenden
- Hexal AG
Acino AG - Kammer
- 3.3.02
- Leitsatz
- -
- Relevante Rechtsnormen
- Basic proposal for the revision of the EPC MR/2/00European Patent Convention Art 112a(2)(c)European Patent Convention Art 112a(3)European Patent Convention Art 114(2)European Patent Convention Art 116(4)European Patent Convention Art 123(2)European Patent Convention Art 24European Patent Convention Art 54(2)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 15(2)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 3(2)
- Schlagwörter
- Admissibility of objection of partiality (yes) - No delay and sufficient substantiation
Admissibility of auxiliary requests (yes) - Bona fide attemps to remedy newly raised deficiencies
Admissibility of auxiliary requests (no) - Not clearly allowable and raising complex problems at late stage
Postponement of oral proceedings because of pending petition for review of a decision rejecting an objection based on suspected partiality (no) - No suspensive effect
Referral of questions to the Enlarged Board of Appeal (no)
Amendments - extension beyond the content of the application as filed (yes)
Claims - clarity after amendment (no) - Orientierungssatz
- -
- Zitierende Akten
- R 0016/22
Order
For these reasons it is decided that:
The appeal is dismissed.