R 0006/22 (Petition clearly unallowable) du 06.11.2023
- Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
- ECLI:EP:BA:2023:R000622.20231106
- Date de la décision
- 6 novembre 2023
- Numéro de l'affaire
- R 0006/22
- Requête en révision de
- -
- Numéro de la demande
- 14824813.1
- Classe de la CIB
- H04W 8/18
- Langue de la procédure
- Anglais
- Distribution
- Non distribuées (D)
- Téléchargement
- Décision en anglais
- Versions JO
- Aucun lien JO trouvé
- Autres décisions pour cet affaire
- -
- Résumés pour cette décision
- Résumé de EPC2000 R 106
- Titre de la demande
- METHOD FOR ACCESSING A SERVICE AND A CORRESPONDING DEVICE
- Nom du demandeur
- Thales Dis France SAS
- Nom de l'opposant
- IDEMIA France
Giesecke+Devrient Mobile Security GmbH
Giesecke & Devrient GmbH - Chambre
- -
- Sommaire
- -
- Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
- European Patent Convention Art 112a(2)(c)European Patent Convention Art 112a(2)(d)European Patent Convention Art 112a(5)European Patent Convention Art 113European Patent Convention Art 113(1)European Patent Convention Art 123(2)European Patent Convention Art 56European Patent Convention R 100(2)European Patent Convention R 104(b)European Patent Convention R 106European Patent Convention R 107(1)European Patent Convention R 107(2)European Patent Convention R 108(1)European Patent Convention R 109(2)(a)European Patent Convention R 109(3)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 013(1)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 013(2)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 015(1)Rules of procedure of the Enlarged Board of Appeal Art 12(1)Rules of procedure of the Enlarged Board of Appeal Art 13Rules of procedure of the Enlarged Board of Appeal Art 14(2)
- Mots-clés
- Petition for review - grounds clearly inadmissible and clearly unallowable
Petition for review - obligation to raise objection
Petition for review - dismissal of objection by the Board (no)
Petition for review - relevant request within the meaning of Rule 104(b) EPC (no)
Petition for review - fundamental violation of Article 113 EPC (no) - Exergue
- In a situation such as the present case - where the board does not react in a recognisable and explicit manner to an intended objection under Rule 106 EPC - a diligent party should normally insist on a discernible response from the board. Failure to do so will leave the party with an indication that weighs against its case (Reasons 16).
- Affaires citantes
- T 2194/22
Order
For these reasons it is decided that:
The petition for review is unanimously rejected as being clearly unallowable.