European Patent Office

T 2194/22 du 19.12.2024

Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
ECLI:EP:BA:2024:T219422.20241219
Date de la décision
19 décembre 2024
Numéro de l'affaire
T 2194/22
Requête en révision de
-
Numéro de la demande
12155832.4
Classe de la CIB
F28D 7/00F25J 1/00
Langue de la procédure
Anglais
Distribution
Distribuées aux présidents des chambres de recours (C)
Téléchargement
Décision en anglais
Versions JO
Aucun lien JO trouvé
Autres décisions pour cet affaire
-
Résumés pour cette décision
Résumé de Article 111 EPC
Titre de la demande
Vertical heat exchanger configuration for lng facility
Nom du demandeur
ConocoPhillips Company
Nom de l'opposant
Linde GmbH
Chambre
3.2.03
Sommaire
-
Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
European Patent Convention Art 111(2)European Patent Convention Art 123(2)European Patent Convention Art 56Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 012(2)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 012(4)
Mots-clés
Inventive step - ex post facto analysis
Inventive step - non-obvious combination of known features
Inventive step - main request (yes)
Appeal decision - binding effect of appeal decision
Amendment to case - objection
Amendment to case - suitability of amendment to address issues (no)
Late-filed objection - admitted (no)
Exergue
1. The admittance of a substantively identical request in post-remittal proceedings is not excluded pursuant to Article 111(2) EPC if the facts underlying the Board's earlier decision for not admitting that request are not the same because a new objection was introduced in post-remittal proceedings (see 2.4).
2. When exercising the discretion to admit a party's request in post-remittal proceedings, the opposition division must take into account the framework defined in the appeal proceedings (see 2.5.1), as the prosecution of a case after remittal should in principle build upon the situation that existed at the end of the appeal proceedings that led to the remittal (see 2.5.2).
Affaires citantes
R 0003/25T 1285/23

Order

For these reasons it is decided that:

The appeal is dismissed.

The request for reimbursement of the appeal fee is refused.