T 1764/08 du 02.12.2010
- Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
- ECLI:EP:BA:2010:T176408.20101202
- Date de la décision
- 2 décembre 2010
- Numéro de l'affaire
- T 1764/08
- Requête en révision de
- -
- Numéro de la demande
- 99960701.3
- Classe de la CIB
- H04N 7/26
- Langue de la procédure
- Anglais
- Distribution
- Distribuées aux présidents des chambres de recours (C)
- Téléchargement
- Décision en anglais
- Versions JO
- Aucun lien JO trouvé
- Autres décisions pour cet affaire
- -
- Résumés pour cette décision
- -
- Titre de la demande
- Motion vector processing
- Nom du demandeur
- Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
- Nom de l'opposant
- -
- Chambre
- 3.5.04
- Sommaire
- -
- Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
- Act revising the Convention on the Grant of European Patents Art 7(1)Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Art 41(2)Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Art 64(2)Decision President of the European Patent Office dated 12 July 2007 concerning the filing of patent applications and other documents by facsimileDecision_AC of 28 June 2001 on the transitional provisions under_Art_7of the Act revising the EPC_Art_001Decision_President_of the European Patent Office dated 12 July 2007 concerning the electronic filing of patent applications and other documents_Art_002(1)Decision_President_of the European Patent Office dated 12 July 2007 concerning the electronic filing of patent applications and other documents_Art_002(3)Decision_President_of the European Patent Office dated 12 July 2007 concerning the electronic filing of patent applications and other documents_Art_012Decision_President_of the European Patent Office dated 12 July 2007 concerning the electronic filing of patent applications and other documents_Art_013European Patent Convention Art 106European Patent Convention Art 108European Patent Convention Art 122(1)European Patent Convention Art 122(2)European Patent Convention R 101(1)European Patent Convention R 126(2)European Patent Convention R 131(4)European Patent Convention R 136(1)European Patent Convention R 2(1)European Patent Convention R 99Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13
- Mots-clés
- Admissibility of appeal - grounds of appeal filed via epoline (no)
Principle of good faith (no)
EPO document submission system unnecessarily complicated (no)
Re-establishment of rights (no)
All due care (no) - Exergue
- See Sections 9 to 10 and 16 to 21
ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. The request for re-establishment of rights is rejected.
2. The appeal is rejected as inadmissible.